Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30014286›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2018

Toward Improving Safety in Neurosurgery with an Active Handheld Instrument.

Sara Moccia, Simone Foti, Arpita Routray, Francesca Prudente, Alessandro Perin, Raymond F Sekula, Leonardo S Mattos, Jeffrey R Balzer, Wendy Fellows-Mayle, Elena De Momi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Automated atlas-based segmentation for skull base surgical planning.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sara MocciaDepartment of Advanced Robotics, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Simone FotiDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Arpita RoutrayRobotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA.
Francesca PrudenteDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro PerinBesta NeuroSim Center, IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy.
Raymond F SekulaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Leonardo S MattosDepartment of Advanced Robotics, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Jeffrey R BalzerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Wendy Fellows-MayleDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Elena De MomiDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Cameron N RiviereRobotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA. camr@ri.cmu.edu.

Funding

An Active Handheld MicromanipulatorR01EB000526 · NIBIB · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI RIVIERE, CAMERON N · 2003 to 2017
$2.6M
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF HERPES ZOSTER AND POSTHERPETIC NEURALGIAK08AG000526 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHMADER, KENNETH E · 1991 to 1995
–
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering R01EB000526NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microsurgical procedures, such as petroclival meningioma resection, require careful surgical actions in order to remove tumor tissue, while avoiding brain and vessel damaging. Such procedures are currently performed under microscope magnification. Robotic tools are emerging in order to filter surgeons' unintended movements and prevent tools from entering forbidden regions such as vascular structures. The present work investigates the use of a handheld robotic tool (Micron) to automate vessel avoidance in microsurgery. In particular, we focused on vessel segmentation, implementing a deep-learning-based segmentation strategy in microscopy images, and its integration with a feature-based passive 3D reconstruction algorithm to obtain accurate and robust vessel position. We then implemented a virtual-fixture-based strategy to control the handheld robotic tool and perform vessel avoidance. Clay vascular phantoms, lying on a background obtained from microscopy images recorded during petroclival meningioma surgery, were used for testing the segmentation and control algorithms. When testing the segmentation algorithm on 100 different phantom images, a median Dice similarity coefficient equal to 0.96 was achieved. A set of 25 Micron trials of 80 s in duration, each involving the interaction of Micron with a different vascular phantom, were recorded, with a safety distance equal to 2 mm, which was comparable to the median vessel diameter. Micron's tip entered the forbidden region 24% of the time when the control algorithm was active. However, the median penetration depth was 16.9 μm, which was two orders of magnitude lower than median vessel diameter. Results suggest the system can assist surgeons in performing safe vessel avoidance during neurosurgical procedures.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSafetyHumansMicrosurgeryNeurosurgical ProceduresNeurosurgeryRobot-assisted surgeryVessel segmentationVirtual fixture control

Identifiers

PMID30014286
PMCPMC6150797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.