Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30014260›Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2018

Fatigue in early, intensively treated and tight-controlled rheumatoid arthritis patients is frequent and persistent: a prospective study.

Margot J M Walter, T M Kuijper, J M W Hazes, A E Weel, J J Luime

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Predictors of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Margot J M WalterDepartment of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Postal box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.walter@erasmusmc.nl.
T M KuijperDepartment of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Postal box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J M W HazesDepartment of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Postal box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
A E WeelDepartment of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Postal box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J J LuimeDepartment of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Postal box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fatigue has a large impact on quality of life and is still unmanageable for many patients. Study aims were describe (1) the prevalence and pattern of fatigue over time in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis under a treat-to-target strategy and (2) identify predictive factors for worsening and recovering of fatigue over time. Data from the tREACH study were used, comparing different treatment strategies with fatigue as secondary objective. Patient outcomes on fatigue, quality of life, depression, and coping were obtained every 6 months and clinically assessed every 3 months. Prediction of fatigue at 12 months was investigated with an ROC curve. Analysis was stratified into non-fatigue and fatigue at baseline. Logistic regression was used for the evolution of fatigue in relation with the covariates over time. Almost half of all patients (n = 246) had high fatigue levels at baseline, decreasing slightly over time. At 12 months, 43% of patients were fatigued; while 23% of the initially fatigued patients showed lower levels of fatigue, the fatigue level had increased in 15% of the initially non-fatigued patients. The strongest predictor of fatigue was the previous fatigue levels (AUC 0.89). Higher score on the depression scale and coping with limitations was associated with developing fatigue over time in the initially non-fatigued group. Despite a strict treat-to-target strategy, fatigue remained an overall problem during the first year of treatment, and was mainly predicted by its baseline status. In subgroups, a small additional effect of depression was seen. Monitoring fatigue and depression may be important in managing fatigue.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexArthritis, RheumatoidComorbidityFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesROC CurveEarly RAFatiguePatient-reported outcomes

Identifiers

PMID30014260
PMCPMC6105154
OpenAlexW2884394222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.