Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30014044›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2018

Salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: Long-term results of urinary incontinence, toxicity and treatment outcomes.

Lisanne F van Dessel, Sarah H M Reuvers, Chris H Bangma, Shafak Aluwini

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Comprehensive Review of the Current State of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Salvage Prostatectomy.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisanne F van DesselDepartment of Experimental Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sarah H M ReuversDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Chris H BangmaDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Shafak AluwiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFor patients with local recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy (35-54%) salvage radiotherapy (SRT) is the treatment of choice. In the post prostatectomy setting, SRT may impose risk at increased toxicity. As data on long-term toxicity, especially on urinary incontinence, are scarce, we report on the long-term treatment outcomes, toxicity and urinary incontinence rates after SRT. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy, who were treated with SRT (3D-CRT) at our institution between 1998 and 2012, were included in this retrospective cohort analysis. Primary endpoint was urinary incontinence rate. Secondary endpoints were acute and late grade ≥2 genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity rates, biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS).

results244 patients were included. Median follow-up after SRT was 50 months (range: 4-187 months). Before start of SRT 69.7% of patients were continent for urine. After SRT de novo urinary incontinence complaints (grade ≥ 1) occurred in the respective acute and late phase in 6.1% and 17.6% of patients. Respective acute grade ≥2 GU and GI toxicity was 19.2% and 17.6%. Late grade ≥2 toxicity for GU was 29.9% and for GI was 21.3%, respectively. The respective 5-year bPFS, OS, DSS and DMFS rates were 47.6%, 91.8%, 98.8% and 80.5%.

conclusionsExperience at our institution with SRT demonstrates that this results in good long-term biochemical control. However, toxicity and urinary incontinence rates were high.

Indexed as

AMS, American medical systemsbPFS, biochemical progression-free survivalCTCAE, common terminology criteria for adverse eventsDMFS, distant metastasis–free survivalDSS, disease specific survivalGI, gastrointestinalGU, genitourinaryGy, grayIMRT, intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniqueOS, overall survivalProstatic neoplasmsPSA, prostate specific antigenRadiotherapyRTOG, radiation therapy oncology groupSalvage therapySRT, salvage radiotherapyToxicityUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID30014044
PMCPMC6019864
OpenAlexW2807191480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.