ArticleSSM - population health2018
Inequalities in socio-emotional development and positive parenting during childhood: Evidence from China 2010-2014.
Article in SSM - population health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early child development: a challenge in China.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Socio-emotional development (SED) is a critical dimension of early childhood development (ECD). However, little research has been conducted thus far regarding inequalities across family income status in children's SED and positive parenting scores in China, which has the second largest population of children in the world. Using nationally representative data from the China Family Panel Survey (CFPS), we addressed this knowledge gap by assessing the levels and trends of inequalities in children's SED scores and positive parenting scores across wealth quintiles between 2010 and 2014. Positive parenting was measured for (1) children aged two and younger (PP_younger) and (2) children between the ages of three and five (PP_older). We adopted five inequality measures, including both absolute and relative measures. We found that, between 2010 and 2014, SED scores significantly increased for all five wealth quintiles, with the first quintile (Q1, the lowest income) growing the fastest. Consequently, observed inequalities in SED scores between Q1 and the fifth wealth quintile (Q5, the highest income) no longer existed in 2014. For the two parenting scores, we observed a significant reduction in inequality between Q1 and Q5, from 1.03 (95% CI: 0.71-1.35) in 2010 to 0.51 (95% CI: 0.27-0.74) in 2014 for PP_younger and from 1.28 (95% CI: 1.09-1.47) in 2010 to 0.53 (95% CI: 0.37-0.70) in 2014 for PP_older. These changes are due to larger increases in scores for children in Q1 compared to Q5 during this time period. These results are highly consistent over different inequality measurements and indicate that both the absolute level and the equality status of young children's SED score and parenting score experienced improvement during the study period. This suggests that China's large investments since 2010 in pre-primary education may have yielded their desired results. Future research should further investigate the association between positive parenting and SED.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.