Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30013950›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2018

Unraveling the Role of Angiogenesis in Cancer Ecosystems.

Iratxe Zuazo-Gaztelu, Oriol Casanovas

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 149 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
149citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

149 citing papers in PubMed, 274 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Brain metastasis: Opportunities for novel therapies.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Consequences of Reprogrammed CD8Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

89 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Iratxe Zuazo-GazteluTumor Angiogenesis Group, ProCURE, Catalan Institute of Oncology - IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain.
Oriol CasanovasTumor Angiogenesis Group, ProCURE, Catalan Institute of Oncology - IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain.
Institut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activation of the tumor and stromal cell-driven angiogenic program is one of the first requirements in the tumor ecosystem for growth and dissemination. The understanding of the dynamic angiogenic tumor ecosystem has rapidly evolved over the last decades. Beginning with the canonical sprouting angiogenesis, followed by vasculogenesis and intussusception, and finishing with vasculogenic mimicry, the need for different neovascularization mechanisms is further explored. In addition, an overview of the orchestration of angiogenesis within the tumor ecosystem cellular and molecular components is provided. Clinical evidence has demonstrated the effectiveness of traditional vessel-directed antiangiogenics, stressing on the important role of angiogenesis in tumor establishment, dissemination, and growth. Particular focus is placed on the interaction between tumor cells and their surrounding ecosystem, which is now regarded as a promising target for the development of new antiangiogenics.

Indexed as

angiogenesisangiogenic tumor ecosystemantiangiogenicsintussusceptionsprouting angiogenesisvasculogenesisvasculogenic mimicry

Identifiers

PMID30013950
PMCPMC6036108
OpenAlexW2811468655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.