Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30013923›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2018

Neural responses to emotional involuntary memories in posttraumatic stress disorder: Differences in timing and activity.

Shana A Hall, Kaitlyn E Brodar, Kevin S LaBar, Dorthe Berntsen, David C Rubin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Functional brain imaging in posttraumatic stress disorder: a review.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  2. Thought content, thought function, acceptance and adaptation over time: Experiences of Turkish veterans and their spouses whose cognitive functions are affected by PTSD.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontal Lobe Circuitry in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.Chronic stress (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shana A HallDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States; Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, United States. Electronic address: shanahall@unc.edu.
Kaitlyn E BrodarDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, United States; Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, United States.
Kevin S LaBarDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, United States.
Dorthe BerntsenCenter on Autobiographical Memory Research, Aarhus University, Denmark.
David C RubinDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, United States; Center on Autobiographical Memory Research, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKDuke University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

A Model of Autobiographical Memory & Its Changes in PTSDR01MH066079 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI RUBIN, DAVID C · 2004 to 2014
$4.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH066079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Involuntary memories are a hallmark symptom of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but studies of the neural basis of involuntary memory retrieval in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are sparse. The study of the neural correlates of involuntary memories of stressful events in PTSD focuses on the voluntary retrieval of memories that are sometimes recalled as intrusive involuntary memories, not on involuntary retrieval while being scanned. Involuntary memory retrieval in controls has been shown to elicit activity in the parahippocampal gyrus, precuneus, inferior parietal cortex, and posterior midline regions. However, it is unknown whether involuntary memories are supported by the same mechanisms in PTSD. Because previous work has shown that both behavioral and neural responsivity is slowed in PTSD, we examined the spatiotemporal dynamics of the neural activity underlying negative and neutral involuntary memory retrieval. Methods: Twenty-one individuals with PTSD and 21 non-PTSD, trauma-exposed controls performed an involuntary memory task, while undergoing a functional magnetic resonance imaging scan. Environmental sounds served as cues for well-associated pictures of negative and neutral scenes. We used a finite impulse response model to analyze temporal differences between groups in neural responses. Results: Compared with controls, participants with PTSD reported more involuntary memories, which were more emotional and more vivid, but which activated a similar network of regions. However, compared to controls, individuals with PTSD showed delayed neural responsivity in this network and increased vmPFC/ACC activity for negative > neutral stimuli. Conclusions: The similarity between PTSD and controls in neural substrates underlying involuntary memories suggests that, unlike voluntary memories, involuntary memories elicit similar activity in regions critical for memory retrieval. Further, the delayed neural responsivity for involuntary memories in PTSD suggests that factors affecting cognition in PTSD, like increased fatigue, or avoidance behaviors could do so by delaying activity in regions necessary for cognitive processing. Finally, compared to neutral memories, negative involuntary memories elicit hyperactivity in the vmPFC, whereas the vmPFC is typically shown to be hypoactive in PTSD during voluntary memory retrieval. These patterns suggest that considering both the temporal dynamics of cognitive processes as well as involuntary cognitive processes would improve existing neurobiological models of PTSD.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrainEmotionsFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemoryStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticTime FactorsYoung AdultACC, anterior cingulate cortexFDR, false detection rateFinite impulse response (FIR)FIR, finite impulse responseFunctional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)FWE, family-wise errorIAPS, International Affective Picture SystemInvoluntary memoryIPC, inferior parietal cortexMemory networkMTL, medial temporal lobesPCC, posterior cingulate cortexPosttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorderSPGR, spoiled gradient recalledSPM, Statistical Parametric MappingTE, echo timeTI, inverse recovery timeTR, repetition timeVentromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC)vmPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID30013923
PMCPMC6024199
OpenAlexW2803049291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.