ArticlePeerJ2018
Searching for best lower dimensional visualization angles for high dimensional RNA-Seq data.
Article in PeerJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accumulation of RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) gene expression data in recent years has resulted in large and complex data sets of high dimensions. Exploratory analysis, including data mining and visualization, reveals hidden patterns and potential outliers in such data, but is often challenged by the high dimensional nature of the data. The scatterplot matrix is a commonly used tool for visualizing multivariate data, and allows us to view multiple bivariate relationships simultaneously. However, the scatterplot matrix becomes less effective for high dimensional data because the number of bivariate displays increases quadratically with data dimensionality. In this study, we introduce a selection criterion for each bivariate scatterplot and design/implement an algorithm that automatically scan and rank all possible scatterplots, with the goal of identifying the plots in which separation between two pre-defined groups is maximized. By applying our method to a multi-experiment
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.