Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30013837›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2018

Minimizing confounders and increasing data quality in murine models for studies of the gut microbiome.

Jun Miyoshi, Vanessa Leone, Kentaro Nobutani, Mark W Musch, Kristina Martinez-Guryn, Yunwei Wang, Sawako Miyoshi, Alexandria M Bobe, A Murat Eren, Eugene B Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Emodin modulates gut microbial community and triggers intestinal immunity.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2023
    Article
  19. Selective ablation of TRA-1-60Theranostics · 2023
    Article
  20. Methods to Study TLRs in Transplantation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jun MiyoshiDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Vanessa LeoneDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Kentaro NobutaniDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Mark W MuschDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Kristina Martinez-GurynDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Yunwei WangDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Sawako MiyoshiDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Alexandria M BobeDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
A Murat ErenDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Eugene B ChangDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.

Funding

ULTRASTRUCTURE AND CYTOMORPHOLOGY COREP30DK042086 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI LIU, CAMBRIAN YANGSHAO · 1990 to 2025
$29.8M
Research Training in Digestive Health, Diseases, and NutritionT32DK007074 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI EUGENE B CHANG · 1986 to 2026
$11.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK042086NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Murine models are widely used to explore host-microbe interactions because of the challenges and limitations inherent to human studies. However, microbiome studies in murine models are not without their nuances. Inter-individual variations in gut microbiota are frequent even in animals housed within the same room. We therefore sought to find an efficient and effective standard operating procedure (SOP) to minimize these effects to improve consistency and reproducibility in murine microbiota studies. Mice were housed in a single room under specific-pathogen free conditions. Soiled cage bedding was routinely mixed weekly and distributed among all cages from weaning (three weeks old) until the onset of the study. Females and males were separated by sex and group-housed (up to five mice/cage) at weaning. 16S rRNA gene analyses of fecal samples showed that this protocol significantly reduced pre-study variability of gut microbiota amongst animals compared to other conventional measures used to normalize microbiota when large experimental cohorts have been required. A significant and consistent effect size was observed in gut microbiota when mice were switched from regular chow to purified diet in both sexes. However, sex and aging appeared to be independent drivers of gut microbial assemblage and should be taken into account in studies of this nature. In summary, we report a practical and effective pre-study SOP for normalizing the gut microbiome of murine cohorts that minimizes inter-individual variability and resolves co-housing problems inherent to male mice. This SOP may increase quality, rigor, and reproducibility of data acquisition and analysis.

Indexed as

Aging effect on microbiotaDiet effect on microbiotaGut microbiotaNormalization of microbiotaSex difference in microbiota

Identifiers

PMID30013837
PMCPMC6046200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.