Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30013743›Full record

ReviewGastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench2018

Biological markers for non-celiac gluten sensitivity: a question awaiting for a convincing answer.

Enzo Ierardi, Giuseppe Losurdo, Domenico Piscitelli, Floriana Giorgio, Annacinzia Amoruso, Andrea Iannone, Mariabeatrice Principi, Alfredo Di Leo

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity: An Update.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity: A Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Novel steps forward in the histopathology of non-celiac gluten sensitivity.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Enzo IerardiSection of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Italy.
Giuseppe LosurdoSection of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Italy.
Domenico PiscitelliSection of Pathology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Italy.
Floriana GiorgioSection of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Italy.
Annacinzia AmorusoSection of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Italy.
Andrea IannoneSection of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Italy.
Mariabeatrice PrincipiSection of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Italy.
Alfredo Di LeoSection of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Italy.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) is characterized by immunological, morphological or symptomatic manifestations precipitated by gluten ingestion in individuals without celiac disease (CD). The most important challenge in NCGS is the diagnosis, currently based only on clinical observation. The "Salerno criteria" have been pointed out to achieve a reliable diagnosis even if they lack immediacy and practicality, thus making questionable patient's adherence. Therefore, biological indicators supporting the clinical diagnosis of NCGS are advisable. For these reasons, many attempts have been performed in order to identify possible serological, immunological, histopathological, immunohistochemical and pathophysiological aspects characterizing this condition with the aim of using them for diagnostic purposes. In the present narrative review, we carried out an update of the current scenario of potential markers of NCGS. The main fault of available studies is that, in most cases investigations have been pointed out towards molecules, which cannot be searched in the current laboratories of clinical analysis. Therefore, the matter has been confined within basic research. Additionally, in these studies, sensitivity and specificity of biological markers were not computable. This is a relevant limit, since an ideal test for NCGS should have a good discriminative power against both CD and other causes of microscopic enteritis. Until now, serological tests have failed, while the search for a soluble marker indicative of activation of innate immune system as well as immunohistochemistry could be the promising bases for the development of appropriate investigations in the future.

Indexed as

CytokinesDiagnosisGluten sensitivityImmunohistochemistryMarker

Identifiers

PMID30013743
PMCPMC6040034
OpenAlexW2883799388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.