Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30013534›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018

Effect of Early Weaning on the Intestinal Microbiota and Expression of Genes Related to Barrier Function in Lambs.

Chong Li, Weimin Wang, Ting Liu, Qian Zhang, Guoxiu Wang, Fadi Li, Fei Li, Xiangpeng Yue, Tingfu Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Probiotic Combination ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sheep-DerivedMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Supplementation withAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chong LiThe State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Weimin WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Ting LiuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Qian ZhangThe State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Guoxiu WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Fadi LiThe State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Fei LiThe State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Xiangpeng YueThe State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Tingfu LiEngineering Laboratory of Sheep Breeding and Reproduction Biotechnology in Gansu Province, Minqin, China.
Gansu Agricultural University · CNMinistry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weaning stress has been reported to impair intestinal health. The gut microbiota plays a vital role in the long-term health of the host. However, our understanding of weaning stress on gut microbiota and barrier function is very limited in livestock species, especially lambs. We investigated the effects of early weaning stress on intestinal bacterial communities and intestinal barrier function in lambs. A total of 24 neonatal male Hu lambs were randomly allocated into two groups, one weaned on day 28 and the other weaned on day 56. At 42 and 84 days, six lambs from each group were randomly selected and sacrificed. Ileal tissue and ileal digesta were collected to compare the differences in ileal microbiota and the mRNA levels of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and tight junction proteins between the early weaning group and the control group at day 42 when the early weaning group have been weaned for 14 days, and at day 84 when the 28 and 56 days weaning groups had been weaned for 56 and 28 days, respectively. 16S rRNA gene sequencing of ileal samples revealed that the ileal microbiota was very different between the two groups, even at 84 days of age. Early weaning significantly increased alpha diversity and altered the relative abundance of several bacterial taxa. The expression of genes related to intestinal barrier function was affected by early weaning. Early weaning significantly increased ileal mRNA levels of

Indexed as

gut microbiotaintestinal barrierlambToll-like receptorsweaning

Identifiers

PMID30013534
PMCPMC6036172
OpenAlexW2811509855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.