Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30013402›Full record

ArticleHIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)2018

Diagnostic discrepancy between bronchoalveolar lavage and transbronchial biopsy from bronchoscopies of HIV patients with pneumonia: toward an integral diagnosis.

Olivia Sánchez-Cabral, Dina Martínez-Mendoza, Ángel Paul Flores-Bello, José Arturo Martínez-Orozco, Rosa María Rivera-Rosales, César Luna-Rivero, Patricio Santillán-Doherty, Gustavo Reyes-Terán

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. GeneXpertAnnals of translational medicine · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Olivia Sánchez-CabralInterventional Pulmonology Unit, dinamarty@gmail.com.
Dina Martínez-MendozaInterventional Pulmonology Unit, dinamarty@gmail.com.
Ángel Paul Flores-BelloClinic of Tuberculosis and Pleural Diseases.
José Arturo Martínez-OrozcoDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology.
Rosa María Rivera-RosalesAnatomic Pathology Service.
César Luna-RiveroAnatomic Pathology Service.
Patricio Santillán-DohertyMedical Direction.
Gustavo Reyes-TeránDepartment of Research in Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Respiratory Diseases Ismael Cosío Villegas, Mexico City, Mexico.
Analatom (United States) · USSociety of Interventional Radiology · USNational Institute of Infectious Diseases · JPOffice of Infectious Diseases · USWuhan Pulmonary Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe key diagnostic method for the evaluation of lung diseases associated with HIV infection is bronchoscopy, with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) being the most commonly used sampling technique. Transbronchial biopsy (TBB) is often complementary.

settingThis is a retrospective cross-sectional study to determine the diagnostic usefulness of bronchoscopy with simultaneous samples obtained through BAL and TBB in HIV-infected patients with pneumonia at the National Institute of Respiratory Diseases Ismael Cosío Villegas.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study (January 2014-December 2015), the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopic samples from all HIV-positive patients with pneumonia aged >18 years, from procedures performed in the Interventional Pulmonology Unit, was analyzed and recorded in its database. The diagnostic yield concordance between BAL and TBB samples was evaluated by kappa index calculation.

resultsA total of 198 procedures on 189 HIV-infected patients with pneumonia were performed. A total of 167/189 (88.4%) patients were male, and the mean age was 34.7 years (SD ±9.0). Overall, the diagnostic yield for either technique was 87.9% (174/198), but it was higher for TBB, its yield being 78.8% (156/198). In contrast, that of BAL was 62.1% (123/198) (

conclusionOur results show that the simultaneous obtainment of BAL and TBB samples is useful and complementary in the diagnosis of infections and malignancies in HIV-infected patients. Additionally, they are safe procedures in this group of patients.

Indexed as

BALbronchoalveolar lavagebronchoscopyHIVinterventional bronchoscopyTBBtransbronchial biopsy

Identifiers

PMID30013402
PMCPMC6038884
OpenAlexW2872729221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.