Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30013323›Full record

SynthesisDrug design, development and therapy2018

Effect of preoperative loading dose ticagrelor and clopidogrel on no-reflow phenomenon during intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Weiran Dai, Ziliang Ye, Lang Li, Qiang Su

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drug design, development and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. "No-Reflow" Phenomenon: A Contemporary Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Weiran DaiDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi Cardiovascular Institute, Nanning, Guangxi, China, drrlilang@126.com.
Ziliang YeDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi Cardiovascular Institute, Nanning, Guangxi, China, drrlilang@126.com.
Lang LiDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi Cardiovascular Institute, Nanning, Guangxi, China, drrlilang@126.com.
Qiang SuDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi Cardiovascular Institute, Nanning, Guangxi, China, drrlilang@126.com.
Guangxi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have shown that ticagrelor is more effective than clopidogrel in platelet inhibition. However, this conclusion remains controversial. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to assess the effect of preoperative loading dose ticagrelor and clopidogrel on no-reflow (NRF) during intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). MATERIALS AND

methodsRandomized controlled trials and observational studies were reviewed. The retrieval time was limited from inception to October 1, 2017. The retrieved databases included PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, the VIP database, and the Wang Fang database. RevMan 5.3 software was used for data analysis.

resultsFourteen randomized controlled trials and one observational study, including 4,162 patients, were included. In these articles, 1,521 patients were in the ticagrelor group (180 mg) and 2,641 patients were in the clopidogrel group (600 mg). The meta-analysis showed that compared with clopidogrel group, preoperative loading dose ticagrelor: 1) significantly reduced the incidence of NRF during PPCI (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15, 0.39,

conclusionCompared with clopidogrel, loading dose ticagrelor effectively reduced both the occurrence of NRF during PPCI and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular event in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing PPCI. Furthermore, it did not increase the risk of bleeding after PPCI.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionClopidogrelHumansObservational Studies as TopicPurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionTicagrelorClopidogrelPurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsTicagrelorclopidogrelmeta-analysisno-reflowprimary PCIticagrelor

Identifiers

PMID30013323
PMCPMC6037407
OpenAlexW2810113433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.