Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30013229›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2018

Assessing pediatric tobacco exposure using parent report: comparison with hair nicotine.

Judith A Groner, Ana M Rule, Sharon A McGrath-Morrow, Joseph M Collaco, Angela Moss, Susanne E Tanski, Robert McMillen, Regina M Whitmore, Jonathan D Klein, Jonathan P Winickoff and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Influences of environmental exposures on preterm lung disease.Expert review of respiratory medicine · 2021
    Review
  3. Identifying the Best Questions for Rapid Screening of Secondhand Smoke Exposure Among Children.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Judith A GronerAAP Julius B. Richmond Center of Excellence, Elk Grove Village, IL, USA. Judith.groner@nationwidechildrens.org.
Ana M RuleAAP Julius B. Richmond Center of Excellence, Elk Grove Village, IL, USA.
Sharon A McGrath-MorrowAAP Julius B. Richmond Center of Excellence, Elk Grove Village, IL, USA.
Joseph M CollacoAAP Julius B. Richmond Center of Excellence, Elk Grove Village, IL, USA.
Angela MossAdult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA.
Susanne E TanskiAAP Julius B. Richmond Center of Excellence, Elk Grove Village, IL, USA.
Robert McMillenAAP Julius B. Richmond Center of Excellence, Elk Grove Village, IL, USA.
Regina M WhitmoreAAP Julius B. Richmond Center of Excellence, Elk Grove Village, IL, USA.
Jonathan D KleinAAP Julius B. Richmond Center of Excellence, Elk Grove Village, IL, USA.
Jonathan P WinickoffAAP Julius B. Richmond Center of Excellence, Elk Grove Village, IL, USA.
Karen WilsonAAP Julius B. Richmond Center of Excellence, Elk Grove Village, IL, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USDartmouth College · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USMississippi State University · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between screening questions for secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure and biomarker results using hair nicotine levels. Our ultimate goal was to develop sensitive and valid screening tools in pediatric clinical settings for SHS exposure.

methodsInvestigators developed a core set of questions regarding exposure. Data from two separate ongoing studies of well children and those with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) were used to assess the concordance between responses and hair nicotine levels. Sensitivity, a positive predictive value, and accuracy were examined.

resultsThere was no single question with similar sensitivity in both populations. The question with the highest positive predictive value (90.8% well-cohort and 84.6% BPD cohort) for both the groups was whether the child had been exposed to in-home smoking in the last 7 days. The question with the highest accuracy for both groups was the number of smokers at home (0 vs ≥ 1), with an accuracy of 72.4% for well children and 79.0% for the BPD cohort.

conclusionsThere was a wide variability in the performance of specific questions. These data demonstrate that a "one-size-fits-all" approach to screening for secondhand tobacco smoke exposure may not be appropriate for all pediatric populations.

Indexed as

BaltimoreBiomarkersBronchopulmonary DysplasiaChild, PreschoolEnvironmental MonitoringFemaleHairHospitals, UniversityHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLinear ModelsMaleNicotineOhioParentsBiomarkersNicotineTobacco Smoke Pollutionbiomarkershair nicotine levelssecondhand smoke exposure

Identifiers

PMID30013229
OpenAlexW2883455782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.