Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30013177›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Removal of Mn (II) by Sodium Alginate/Graphene Oxide Composite Double-Network Hydrogel Beads from Aqueous Solutions.

Xiuzhen Yang, Tengzhi Zhou, Bozhi Ren, Andrew Hursthouse, Yuezhou Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Removal of heavy metals in aquatic environment by graphene oxide composites: a review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiuzhen YangCollege of Civil Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, 411201, China.
Tengzhi ZhouCollege of Civil Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, 411201, China.
Bozhi RenCollege of Civil Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, 411201, China.
Andrew HursthouseCollege of Civil Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, 411201, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3690-2957
Yuezhou ZhangPharmaceutical Sciences Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Engineering, Åbo Akademi University, FI-20520, Turku, Finland. zyuezhou@126.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 51604113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After the successful preparation of empirical double network hydrogel beads from graphene oxide/sodium alginate(GO/SA), its cationic metal adsorption performance in aqueous solutions were investigated. Taking Mn(II) as an example, the contribution of several factors including pH, bead dosage, temperature, contact time and initial concentration ions to adsorption efficiency were examined. The Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) results indicate that the GO/SA double (GAD) network hydrogel bead strongly interpenetrate and the adsorption of Mn(II) is mainly influenced by solution pH, bead dose and temperature. The GAD beads exhibit an excellent adsorption capacity of 56.49 mg g

Identifiers

PMID30013177
PMCPMC6048064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.