Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30013066›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Root exudate metabolites drive plant-soil feedbacks on growth and defense by shaping the rhizosphere microbiota.

Lingfei Hu, Christelle A M Robert, Selma Cadot, Xi Zhang, Meng Ye, Beibei Li, Daniele Manzo, Noemie Chervet, Thomas Steinger, Marcel G A van der Heijden and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 504 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
504citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

504 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Root colonization by beneficial rhizobacteria.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Metal-Phenolic Complexation Governs Soil Mineral Crystallinity to Enhance Crop Growth.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

444 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lingfei HuInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, 3013, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7791-9440
Christelle A M RobertInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, 3013, Bern, Switzerland.
Selma CadotDivision of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, 8046, Zürich, Switzerland.
Xi ZhangInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, 3013, Bern, Switzerland.
Meng YeInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, 3013, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6785-0099
Beibei LiInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, 3013, Bern, Switzerland.
Daniele ManzoInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, 3013, Bern, Switzerland.
Noemie ChervetDivision of Plant Protection, Agroscope, 1260, Nyon, Switzerland.
Thomas SteingerDivision of Plant Protection, Agroscope, 1260, Nyon, Switzerland.
Marcel G A van der HeijdenDivision of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, 8046, Zürich, Switzerland.
Klaus SchlaeppiInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, 3013, Bern, Switzerland. klaus.schlaeppi@ips.unibe.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3620-0875
Matthias ErbInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, 3013, Bern, Switzerland. matthias.erb@ips.unibe.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4446-9834

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) 136184Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) 160786Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) 164480Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) 165891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By changing soil properties, plants can modify their growth environment. Although the soil microbiota is known to play a key role in the resulting plant-soil feedbacks, the proximal mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain unknown. We found that benzoxazinoids, a class of defensive secondary metabolites that are released by roots of cereals such as wheat and maize, alter root-associated fungal and bacterial communities, decrease plant growth, increase jasmonate signaling and plant defenses, and suppress herbivore performance in the next plant generation. Complementation experiments demonstrate that the benzoxazinoid breakdown product 6-methoxy-benzoxazolin-2-one (MBOA), which accumulates in the soil during the conditioning phase, is both sufficient and necessary to trigger the observed phenotypic changes. Sterilization, fungal and bacterial profiling and complementation experiments reveal that MBOA acts indirectly by altering root-associated microbiota. Our results reveal a mechanism by which plants determine the composition of rhizosphere microbiota, plant performance and plant-herbivore interactions of the next generation.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyAnimalsBacteriaBenzoxazolesCyclic N-OxidesFlavonoidsFungiGlucosidesHerbivoryLarvaPlant LeavesPlant RootsPyrrolesRhizosphereSoilSpodoptera5-carbamoyl-5-methyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide6-methoxybenzoxazolinoneBenzoxazolesCyclic N-OxidesFlavonoidsGlucosidesmaysinPyrrolesSoil

Identifiers

PMID30013066
PMCPMC6048113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.