Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30013046›Full record

ArticleNature methods2018

High-precision automated reconstruction of neurons with flood-filling networks.

Michał Januszewski, Jörgen Kornfeld, Peter H Li, Art Pope, Tim Blakely, Larry Lindsey, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard, Mike Tyka, Winfried Denk, Viren Jain

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 168 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
168citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

168 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. High-throughput, organ-scale 3D tubule tracking using TubuleMAP.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

108 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michał JanuszewskiGoogle AI, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3480-2744
Jörgen KornfeldMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Planegg, Martinsried, Germany.
Peter H LiGoogle AI, Mountain View, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6193-4454
Art PopeGoogle AI, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Tim BlakelyGoogle AI, Seattle, WA, USA.
Larry LindseyGoogle AI, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jeremy Maitin-ShepardGoogle AI, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Mike TykaGoogle AI, Seattle, WA, USA.
Winfried DenkMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Planegg, Martinsried, Germany.
Viren JainGoogle AI, Mountain View, CA, USA. viren@google.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1488-3505

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconstruction of neural circuits from volume electron microscopy data requires the tracing of cells in their entirety, including all their neurites. Automated approaches have been developed for tracing, but their error rates are too high to generate reliable circuit diagrams without extensive human proofreading. We present flood-filling networks, a method for automated segmentation that, similar to most previous efforts, uses convolutional neural networks, but contains in addition a recurrent pathway that allows the iterative optimization and extension of individual neuronal processes. We used flood-filling networks to trace neurons in a dataset obtained by serial block-face electron microscopy of a zebra finch brain. Using our method, we achieved a mean error-free neurite path length of 1.1 mm, and we observed only four mergers in a test set with a path length of 97 mm. The performance of flood-filling networks was an order of magnitude better than that of previous approaches applied to this dataset, although with substantially increased computational costs.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBrainDrosophilaFinchesImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMachine LearningMaleMiceMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionNerve NetNeuritesNeurons

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.