Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30012936›Full record

ArticleExperimental animals2018

Electroporation-mediated genome editing in vitrified/warmed mouse zygotes created by IVF via ultra-superovulation.

Yoshiko Nakagawa, Tetsushi Sakuma, Toru Takeo, Naomi Nakagata, Takashi Yamamoto

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental animals, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Recent Advances in the Production of Genome-Edited Rats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cryopreservation of mouse resources.Laboratory animal research · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshiko NakagawaCenter for Animal Resources and Development (CARD), Kumamoto University, 2-2-1 Honjo, Kumamoto 860-0811, Japan.
Tetsushi SakumaDepartment of Mathematical and Life Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan.
Toru TakeoCenter for Animal Resources and Development (CARD), Kumamoto University, 2-2-1 Honjo, Kumamoto 860-0811, Japan.
Naomi NakagataCenter for Animal Resources and Development (CARD), Kumamoto University, 2-2-1 Honjo, Kumamoto 860-0811, Japan.
Takashi YamamotoDepartment of Mathematical and Life Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan.
Kumamoto University · JPHiroshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, genome editing in mouse zygotes has become convenient and scalable, in association with various technological developments and improvements such as novel nuclease tools, alternative delivery methods, and contemporary reproductive engineering techniques. We have so far demonstrated the applicability of ultra-superovulation, in vitro fertilization (IVF), and vitrification/warming of zygotes in microinjection-mediated mouse genome editing. Moreover, an electroporation-mediated method has rapidly become established for simple gene knockout and small precise modifications including single amino acid substitutions. Here, we present an updated example of an application coupling the following three latest technologies: 1) CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein as the most convenient genome-editing reagent, 2) electroporation as the most effortless delivery method, and 3) cryopreserved oocytes created by IVF via ultra-superovulation as the most animal welfare- and user-friendly strategy. We successfully created gene knockout and knock-in mice carrying insertion/deletion mutations and single amino acid substitutions, respectively, using the streamlined production system of mouse genome editing described above, referred to as the CREATRE (CARD-based Reproductive Engineering-Assisted Technology for RNP Electroporation) system. Owing to its accessibility, robustness, and high efficiency, we believe that our CREATRE protocol will become widely used globally for the production of genome-edited mice.

Indexed as

ElectroporationReproductive TechniquesSuperovulationZygoteAmino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsCryopreservationFemaleFertilization in VitroGene EditingGene Knock-In TechniquesGene Knockout TechniquesMice, Inbred C57BLOocytesRibonucleoproteinsRibonucleoproteinsCRISPR–Cas9electroporationgenome editingultra-superovulation

Identifiers

PMID30012936
PMCPMC6219886
OpenAlexW2884501400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.