Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30012908›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology2019

Impact of Comorbidities on Survival in Gastric, Colorectal, and Lung Cancer Patients.

Toshitaka Morishima, Yoshifumi Matsumoto, Nobuyuki Koeda, Hiroko Shimada, Tsutomu Maruhama, Daisaku Matsuki, Kayo Nakata, Yuri Ito, Takahiro Tabuchi, Isao Miyashiro

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Competing Mortality Redefines the Net Benefit of Additional Surgery After Endoscopic Resection for T1 Colorectal Cancer in Older Adults.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Toshitaka MorishimaCancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0747-3287
Yoshifumi MatsumotoCancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute.
Nobuyuki KoedaYao Municipal Hospital.
Hiroko ShimadaNational Hospital Organization Osaka Minami Medical Center.
Tsutomu MaruhamaHigashisumiyoshi Morimoto Hospital.
Daisaku MatsukiSaiseikai Suita Hospital.
Kayo NakataCancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute.
Yuri ItoCancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute.
Takahiro TabuchiCancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1050-3125
Isao MiyashiroCancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe presence of comorbidities in cancer patients may influence treatment decisions and prognoses. This study aimed to examine the impact of comorbidities on overall survival in Japanese patients diagnosed with major solid tumors.

methodsTo obtain patient-level information on clinical conditions and vital status, we performed a record linkage of population-based cancer registry data from Osaka Prefecture, Japan and administrative data produced under the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) system. The study population comprised patients who received a primary diagnosis of gastric, colorectal, or lung cancer between 2010 and 2012 at any of five cancer centers. We employed the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score to quantify the impact of comorbidities on survival. The association between CCI score and survival for each cancer site was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression models for all-cause mortality, after adjusting for patient sex, age at cancer diagnosis, and cancer stage.

resultsA total of 2,609 patients with a median follow-up duration of 1,372 days were analyzed. The most frequent CCI score among the patients was 0 (77.7%), followed by 2 (14.3%). After adjusting for the covariates, we detected a significant association between CCI score and all-cause mortality. The hazard ratios per one-point increase in CCI score were 1.12 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.23), 1.20 (95% CI, 1.08-1.34), and 1.14 (95% CI, 1.04-1.24) for gastric, colorectal, and lung cancer, respectively.

conclusionsComorbidities have a negative prognostic impact on overall survival in cancer patients, and should be assessed as risk factors for mortality when reporting outcomes.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsComorbidityFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansJapanLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk FactorsStomach NeoplasmsSurvival Analysisadministrative claims datacomorbiditymedical record linkageneoplasmssurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID30012908
PMCPMC6375811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.