Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30012790›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Episiotomy practice in six Palestinian hospitals: a population-based cohort study among singleton vaginal births.

Kaled Zimmo, Katariina Laine, Erik Fosse, Mohammed Zimmo, Hadil Ali-Masri, Manuela Zucknick, Åse Vikanes, Sahar Hassan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02427854 (Can Perineal Tears and Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries in Palestine be Prevented? A Study of Two Different Interventions), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02427854 nacompletednot on this map

Can Perineal Tears and Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries in Palestine be Prevented? A Study of Two Different Interventions

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2015 to 2018Enrolled51,041ConditionsComplication of Labor and DeliveryArmsEducation by animated training video, Interactive hands-on bedside training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kaled ZimmoDepartment of Obstetrics, Al Aqsa Hospital, Gaza, Palestine.ORCID 0000-0001-8413-082X
Katariina LaineDepartment of Obstetrics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Erik FosseThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Mohammed ZimmoThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0177-4521
Hadil Ali-MasriThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7075-2636
Manuela ZucknickDepartment of Biostatistics, Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Åse VikanesThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Sahar HassanDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Pharmacy, Nursing and Health Professions, Birzeit University, Birzeit, Palestine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the rates, characteristics and indications for episiotomy among women delivering vaginally for the first time, as well as parous women. STUDY

designA prospective, population-based birth cohort study.

settingObstetric departments in six Palestinian government hospitals.

participantsAll women with singleton vaginal births (n=29 165) from 1 March 2015 until 1 March 2016.

methodsAll women were divided into two groups: first vaginal birth group (n=9108), including primiparous women and women with their first vaginal birth after one caesarean section, and the parous group (n=20 057). Each group was analysed separately. Data were presented as numbers and percentages or range. Differences in rates were assessed by the p values of χ

main outcome measuresEpisiotomy rates and indications among women of singleton births.

resultsThe overall episiotomy rate was 28.7%: 78.8% for women with first vaginal birth (range 56.6%-86.0%) and 5.9% for parous women (range 1.0%-9.5%). The most common indications for episiotomy were 'primiparity' in the first vaginal birth group (69.9%) and 'protecting the perineum' in the parous group (59.5%). The least common indications were prolonged second stage (1.5%) and fetal distress (6.9%), respectively.

conclusionIn Palestine, the majority of women who delivered vaginally for the first time had an episiotomy. Education of birth attendants, clinical audits, educational interventions and adherence to the updated guidelines may help to decrease the routine overuse of episiotomy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultArabsCase-Control StudiesEpisiotomyFemaleHospitalsHumansMiddle EastObstetric Labor ComplicationsParityPregnancyProspective StudiesUnnecessary ProceduresYoung Adultepisiotomy ratesindications for episiotomyPalestinesingleton vaginal birth

Identifiers

PMID30012790
PMCPMC6082490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.