Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30012780›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Using an interactive virtual environment to integrate a digital Action Research Arm Test, motor imagery and action observation to assess and improve upper limb motor function in patients with neuromuscular impairments: a usability and feasibility study protocol.

Frank Behrendt, Corina Schuster-Amft

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03268304 (Feasibility of Two Novel Interactive Software Modules for the Rehabilitation of Patients With Neuromuscular Upper Limb Impairments Using the YouGrabber Training System - the KAYO Study Protocol), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03268304 withdrawnnot on this map

Feasibility of Two Novel Interactive Software Modules for the Rehabilitation of Patients With Neuromuscular Upper Limb Impairments Using the YouGrabber Training System - the KAYO Study Protocol

TypeobservationalSponsorReha RheinfeldenRan2018 to 2020Enrolled0ConditionsStroke, Parkinson Disease, Traumatic Brain Injury, Guillain-Barre SyndromeArmsVR-based training including AO and MI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Frank BehrendtResearch Department, Reha Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland.
Corina Schuster-AmftResearch Department, Reha Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland.
Bern University of Applied Sciences · CHReha Rheinfelden · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the recent past, training systems using an interactive virtual environment have been introduced to neurorehabilitation. Such systems can be applied to encourage purposeful limb movements and will increasingly be used at home by the individual patient. Therefore, an integrated valid and reliable assessment tool on the basis of such a system to monitor the recovery process would be an essential asset.

objectivesThe aim of the study is to evaluate usability, feasibility and validity of the digital version of the Action Research Arm Test using the Bi-Manu-Trainer system as a platform. Additionally, the feasibility and usability of the implementation of action observation and motor imagery tasks into the Bi-Manu-Trainer software will be evaluated. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis observational study is planned as a single-arm trial for testing the new assessment and the action observation and motor imagery training module. Therefore, 75 patients with Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, stroke, traumatic brain injury or Guillain-Barré syndrome will be included. 30 out of the 75 patients will additionally take part in a 4-week training on the enhanced Bi-Manu-Trainer system. Primary outcomes will be the score on the System Usability Scale and the correlation between the conventional and digital Action Research Arm Test scores. Secondary outcomes will be hand dexterity, upper limb activities of daily living and quality of life. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesise that the digital Action Research Arm Test assessment is a valid and essential tool and that it is feasible to incorporate action observation and motor imagery into Bi-Manu-Trainer practice. The results are expected to give recommendations for necessary modifications and might also contribute knowledge concerning the application of action observation and motor imagery tasks using a training system such as the Bi-Manu-Trainer. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03268304; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationRecovery of FunctionUser-Computer InterfaceActivities of Daily LivingExercise TherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansImagery, PsychotherapyMaleMotor ActivityNeuromuscular DiseasesObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesQuality of LifeResearch Designmultiple sclerosisparkinson’s diseaserehabilitation medicinestroke

Identifiers

PMID30012780
PMCPMC6082472
OpenAlexW2884813531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.