Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30012748›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Evolutionary thanatology.

James R Anderson, Dora Biro, Paul Pettitt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Responses to death and dying: primates and other mammals.Primates; journal of primatology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Do chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) console a bereaved mother?Primates; journal of primatology · 2020
    Article
  15. Primate thanatology and hominoid mortuary archeology.Primates; journal of primatology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James R AndersonGraduate School of Letters, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan j.r.anderson@psy.bun.kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-2441-0728
Dora BiroDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3408-6274
Paul PettittDepartment of Archaeology, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6195-9376

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Societies, including those of humans, have evolved multiple ways of dealing with death across changing circumstances and pressures. Despite many studies focusing on specialized topics, for example necrophoresis in eusocial insects, mortuary activities in early human societies, or grief and mourning in bereavement, there has been little attempt to consider these disparate research endeavours from a broader evolutionary perspective. Evolutionary thanatology does this by adopting an explicit evolutionary stance for studies of death and dying within the sociological, psychological and biological disciplines. The collection of papers in this themed issue demonstrates the value of this approach by describing what is known about how various nonhuman species detect and respond to death in conspecifics, how problems of disposing of the dead have evolved in human societies across evolutionary time and also within much shorter time frames, how human adults' understanding of death develops, and how it is ultimately reflected in death-related language. The psychological significance and impact of death is clearly seen in some species' grief-like reactions to the loss of attachment figures, and perhaps uniquely in humans, the existence of certain psychological processes that may lead to suicide. Several research questions are proposed as starting points for building a more comprehensive picture of the ontogeny and phylogeny of how organisms deal with death.This article is part of the theme issue 'Evolutionary thanatology: impacts of the dead on the living in humans and other animals'.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionDeathGriefThanatologyAnimalsHumansdeathdeath awarenessdyinghumansmortuary activitiesnonhuman animals

Identifiers

PMID30012748
PMCPMC6053987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.