Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30012745›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Occurrence and variability of tactile interactions between wild American crows and dead conspecifics.

Kaeli Swift, John M Marzluff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dimensions of Animal Consciousness.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Responses to death and dying: primates and other mammals.Primates; journal of primatology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Comparative thanatology, an integrative approach: exploring sensory/cognitive aspects of death recognition in vertebrates and invertebrates.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  13. Evolutionary thanatology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kaeli SwiftSchool of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington College of the Environment, Seattle, WA 98195-5350, USA kaelis@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4736-0199
John M MarzluffSchool of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington College of the Environment, Seattle, WA 98195-5350, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observations of some mammals and birds touching their dead provoke questions about the motivation and adaptive value of this potentially risky behaviour. Here, we use controlled experiments to determine if tactile interactions are characteristic of wild American crow responses to dead crows, and what the prevalence and nature of tactile interactions suggests about their motivations. In Experiment 1, we test if food or information acquisition motivates contact by presenting crows with taxidermy-prepared dead crows, and two species crows are known to scavenge: dead pigeons and dead squirrels. In Experiment 2, we test if territoriality motivates tactile interactions by presenting crows with taxidermy crows prepared to look either dead or upright and life-like. In Experiment 1, we find that crows are significantly less likely to make contact but more likely to alarm call and recruit other birds in response to dead crows than to dead pigeons and squirrels. In addition, we find that aggressive and sexual encounters with dead crows are seasonally biased. These findings are inconsistent with feeding or information acquisition-based motivation. In Experiment 2, we find that crows rarely dive-bomb and more often alarm call and recruit other crows to dead than to life-like crows, behaviours inconsistent with responses given to live intruders. Consistent with a danger response hypothesis, our results show that alarm calling and neighbour recruitment occur more frequently in response to dead crows than other stimuli, and that touching dead crows is atypical. Occasional contacts, which take a variety of aggressive and sexual forms, may result from an inability to mediate conflicting stimuli.This article is part of the theme issue 'Evolutionary thanatology: impacts of the dead on the living in humans and other animals'.

Indexed as

DeathMotivationTouchAnimalsBiological EvolutionCrowsFeeding BehaviorInformation Storage and RetrievalTerritorialityThanatologyWashingtonAmerican crowcomparative thanatologydead conspecificdead heterospecificnecrophiliatactile interactions

Identifiers

PMID30012745
PMCPMC6053988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.