Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30012691›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

Cerebellar Processing Common to Delay and Trace Eyelid Conditioning.

Hunter E Halverson, Andrei Khilkevich, Michael D Mauk

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Stimulus Contingency and Task Context Encoding within the Anterior Cingulate-Amygdala-Cerebellum Associative Learning Network.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hunter E HalversonCenter for Learning and Memory and hunter.halverson@utexas.edu.
Andrei KhilkevichCenter for Learning and Memory and.ORCID 0000-0002-1876-4928
Michael D MaukCenter for Learning and Memory and.ORCID 0000-0002-8208-1873
Institute for Learning and Development · USHunter Water · AU

Funding

REVERSIBLE LESIONS--CEREBELLAR MECHANISMS MOTOR LEARNINGR01MH046904 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MAUK, MICHAEL D · 1997 to 2016
$5.5M
Forebrain-Cerebellum Interactions in Trace ConditioningR01MH074006 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MAUK, MICHAEL D · 2005 to 2015
$3.3M
Cerebellar processing of noisy inputsR01NS098308 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MAUK, MICHAEL D · 2017 to 2020
$1.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH046904NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074006NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS098308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Results from previous lesion studies have been interpreted as evidence that the cerebellar cortex plays different roles for delay and trace conditioning of eyelid responses. However, the cerebellar cortex is organized by parasagittal stripes of Purkinje cells (PCs) that converge onto common deep nucleus neurons and receive common or related climbing fiber inputs. Based on this organization, we hypothesized that cerebellar tasks involving the same response system, such as delay and trace eyelid conditioning, would engage the same PCs and that the relationships between PC activity and expression of behavioral responses would be similar for both tasks. To test these hypotheses, we used tetrode recordings from eyelid PCs in rabbits during expression of delay- and trace-conditioned eyelid responses. Previous recording studies during delay conditioning described a strong relationship between eyelid PC activity and the kinematics of conditioned eyelid responses. The present results replicate these findings for delay conditioning and show that the same relationship exists during trace eyelid conditioning. During transitions from delay to trace responding, the relationship between eyelid PCs and behavioral responses was relatively stable. We found that an inverse firing rate model tuned to predict PC activity during one training paradigm could then predict equally well the PC activity during the other training paradigm. These results provide strong evidence that cerebellar cortex processing is similar for delay and trace eyelid conditioning and that the parasagittal organization of the cerebellum, not the conditioning paradigm, dictate which neurons are engaged to produce adaptively timed conditioned responses.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCerebellar CortexConditioning, EyelidLinear ModelsMaleModels, NeurologicalPurkinje CellsRabbitsTime Factorscerebellumeyelid conditioningmodelingPurkinje celltetrode recordingstrace conditioning

Identifiers

PMID30012691
PMCPMC6096038
OpenAlexW2883346969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.