Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30012646›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2018

E-cigarette adverts and children's perceptions of tobacco smoking harms: an experimental study and meta-analysis.

Milica Vasiljevic, Amelia St John Wallis, Saphsa Codling, Dominique-Laurent Couturier, Stephen Sutton, Theresa M Marteau

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Milica VasiljevicBehaviour and Health Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7454-7744
Amelia St John WallisBehaviour and Health Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Saphsa CodlingBehaviour and Health Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Dominique-Laurent CouturierBehaviour and Health Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Stephen SuttonBehaviour and Health Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Theresa M MarteauBehaviour and Health Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3025-1129

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesChildren exposed to electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) adverts may perceive occasional tobacco smoking as less harmful than children not exposed to e-cigarette adverts. Given the potential cross-cueing effects of e-cigarette adverts on tobacco smoking, there is an urgent need to establish whether the effect found in prior research is robust and replicable using a larger sample and a stronger control condition.

designA between-subjects experiment with one independent factor of two levels corresponding to the advertisements to which participants were exposed: glamorous adverts for e-cigarettes, or adverts for objects unrelated to smoking or vaping.

participantsEnglish school children aged 11-16 (n=1449). OUTCOMES: Perceived harm of occasional smoking of one or two tobacco cigarettes was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included: perceived harm of regular tobacco smoking, susceptibility to tobacco smoking and perceived prevalence of tobacco smoking in young people. Perceptions of using e-cigarettes were gauged by adapting all the outcome measures used to assess perceptions of tobacco smoking.

resultsTobacco smokers and e-cigarette users were excluded from analyses (final sample n=1057). Children exposed to glamorous e-cigarette adverts perceived the harms of occasional smoking of one or two tobacco cigarettes to be lower than those in the control group (

conclusionsThis study adds to existing evidence that exposure to e-cigarette adverts reduces children's perceptions of the harm of occasional tobacco smoking.

Indexed as

AdvertisingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceSchoolsTobacco SmokingUnited Kingdome-cigarette marketingelectronic cigarettespreventive medicinepriority populationspublic healthtobacco smoking

Identifiers

PMID30012646
PMCPMC6082488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.