Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30012615›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

NIH funding longevity by gender.

Lisa A Hechtman, Nathan P Moore, Claire E Schulkey, Andrew C Miklos, Anna Maria Calcagno, Richard Aragon, Judith H Greenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration.Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Accomplished women leaders in informatics: insights about successful careers.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lisa A HechtmanNational Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.ORCID 0000-0001-9658-9961
Nathan P MooreNational Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.ORCID 0000-0002-5505-9304
Claire E SchulkeyNational Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.ORCID 0000-0003-1600-3102
Andrew C MiklosNational Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.ORCID 0000-0002-1918-8352
Anna Maria CalcagnoNational Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.ORCID 0000-0002-0804-2753
Richard AragonNational Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.ORCID 0000-0002-9598-2048
Judith H GreenbergNational Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892 Greenbej@nigms.NIH.gov.ORCID 0000-0003-3086-6596

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women have achieved parity with men among biomedical science degree holders but remain underrepresented in academic positions. The National Institutes of Health (NIH)-the world's largest public funder of biomedical research-receives less than one-third of its new grant applications from women. Correspondingly, women compose less than one-third of NIH research grantees, even though they are as successful as men in obtaining first-time grants. Our study examined women's and men's NIH funding trajectories over time (

Indexed as

LongevityNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)WomenBiomedical ResearchFemaleFinancing, OrganizedHumansMaleUnited Statesacademiabiomedical workforcegender disparitiesNational Institutes of HealthNIH funding

Identifiers

PMID30012615
PMCPMC6077749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.