Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30012544›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2018

Community Volunteer Support for Families With Young Children: Protocol for the Volunteer Family Connect Randomized Controlled Trial.

Rebekah Grace, Lynn Kemp, Jacqueline Barnes, Emma Elcombe, Jennifer Knight, Kelly Baird, Vana Webster, Fiona Byrne

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Post-Natal Short-Term Home Visiting Programs: An Overview and a Volunteers-Based Program Pilot.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebekah Grace *Department of Educational Studies, Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7812-8077
Lynn Kemp *Translational Research and Social Innovation, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Liverpool, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0348-1837
Jacqueline Barnes *Institute for the Study of Children, Families and Social Issues, Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5566-8997
Emma Elcombe *Translational Research and Social Innovation, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Liverpool, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1829-9093
Jennifer Knight *Department of Educational Studies, Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9687-8031
Kelly Baird *Department of Educational Studies, Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3934-5084
Vana WebsterDepartment of Educational Studies, Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4725-9242
Fiona ByrneTranslational Research and Social Innovation, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Liverpool, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9278-7573
Macquarie University · AUWestern Sydney University · AUBirkbeck, University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUse of community volunteers to support vulnerable families is a widely employed strategy with a long history. However, there has been minimal formal scientific investigation into the effectiveness of volunteer home visiting programs for families. There is also a need for research examining whether volunteer home visiting leads to improved outcomes for volunteers.

objectiveThe objective of this paper is to describe the research protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the Volunteer Family Connect intervention, a volunteer home visiting program designed to support families of young children who experience social isolation or a lack of parenting confidence and skills. The project is being conducted in partnership with 3 leading not-for-profit organizations, designed to contribute to the body of evidence that informs decisions about appropriate family support services according to the level of need. It is the first study to examine outcomes for both the families and the volunteers who deliver the service.

methodsThe RCT is being conducted in 7 sites across Australia. We aim to recruit 300 families to the study: 150 control (services as usual) and 150 intervention (services as usual + volunteer home visiting) families. Intervention families will receive the service for 3-12 months according to their needs, and all participants will complete 6 data collection points over 15 months. A minimum of 80 volunteers will also be recruited, along with a matched community comparison group. The volunteers will complete 3 data collection points over 12 months. Primary outcomes include community connectedness and parenting competence. Secondary outcomes include parent physical and mental health; general parent well-being; parent empowerment; the child-parent relationship; sustainability of family routines; child immunization; child nutrition or breastfeeding; number of accidental injury reports; and volunteer health, well-being, and community connectedness.

resultsThis effectiveness trial was funded in 2016, and we aim to complete data collection by the end of 2018. The first results are expected to be submitted early in 2019.

conclusionsThere is a need to rigorously assess volunteer home visiting and whether it has a unique and important role on the service landscape, complementary to professional services. This research is the first trial of a volunteer home visiting program to be conducted in Australia and one of the largest of its kind worldwide.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12616000396426; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=370304 (Archived by WebCite athttp://www.webcitation.org/70q42fU7V). REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER: RR1-10.2196/1000.

Indexed as

familiesrandomized controlled trialsupport servicesvolunteer home visiting

Identifiers

PMID30012544
PMCPMC6066638
OpenAlexW2883730353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.