Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30012517›Full record

ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2018

Free-energy minimization in joint agent-environment systems: A niche construction perspective.

Jelle Bruineberg, Erik Rietveld, Thomas Parr, Leendert van Maanen, Karl J Friston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Higher order affordances.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. An Active-Inference Approach to Second-Person Neuroscience.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Federated inference and belief sharing.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Organizational Neuroscience of Industrial Adaptive Behavior.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The evolution of brain architectures for predictive coding and active inference.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jelle BruinebergDepartment of Philosophy, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Brain and Cognition Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: j.p.bruineberg@uva.nl.
Erik RietveldDepartment of Philosophy, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Brain and Cognition Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Philosophy, University of Twente, The Netherlands. Electronic address: d.w.rietveld@amc.uva.nl.
Thomas ParrWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK. Electronic address: thomas.parr.12@ucl.ac.uk.
Leendert van MaanenAmsterdam Brain and Cognition Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Karl J FristonWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK. Electronic address: k.friston@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The free-energy principle is an attempt to explain the structure of the agent and its brain, starting from the fact that an agent exists (Friston and Stephan, 2007; Friston et al., 2010). More specifically, it can be regarded as a systematic attempt to understand the 'fit' between an embodied agent and its niche, where the quantity of free-energy is a measure for the 'misfit' or disattunement (Bruineberg and Rietveld, 2014) between agent and environment. This paper offers a proof-of-principle simulation of niche construction under the free-energy principle. Agent-centered treatments have so far failed to address situations where environments change alongside agents, often due to the action of agents themselves. The key point of this paper is that the minimum of free-energy is not at a point in which the agent is maximally adapted to the statistics of a static environment, but can better be conceptualized an attracting manifold within the joint agent-environment state-space as a whole, which the system tends toward through mutual interaction. We will provide a general introduction to active inference and the free-energy principle. Using Markov Decision Processes (MDPs), we then describe a canonical generative model and the ensuing update equations that minimize free-energy. We then apply these equations to simulations of foraging in an environment; in which an agent learns the most efficient path to a pre-specified location. In some of those simulations, unbeknownst to the agent, the 'desire paths' emerge as a function of the activity of the agent (i.e. niche construction occurs). We will show how, depending on the relative inertia of the environment and agent, the joint agent-environment system moves to different attracting sets of jointly minimized free-energy.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalBrainEntropyHumansActive inferenceAdaptive environmentsAgent-environment complementarityDesire pathsFree energy principleMarkov decision processesNiche construction

Identifiers

PMID30012517
PMCPMC6117456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.