Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30012178›Full record

ArticleTrials2018

SEALIVE: the use of technical vessel-sealing devices for recipient hepatectomy in liver transplantation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Philipp Houben, Elias Khajeh, Ulf Hinz, Phillip Knebel, Markus K Diener, Arianeb Mehrabi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04265157 (Hepato-duodenal Ligament Occlusion Versus Classic Technique During Recipient Hepatectomy in Liver Transplantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04265157 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Hepato-duodenal Ligament Occlusion Versus Classic Technique During Recipient Hepatectomy in Liver Transplantation

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled50ConditionsLiver TransplantArmsSurgical technique surgical occlusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philipp HoubenDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. philipp.houben@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5234-732X
Elias KhajehDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ulf HinzDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Phillip KnebelDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus K DienerDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Arianeb MehrabiDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe surgical technique used in liver transplantation has undergone constant evolution in an effort to develop a safe, highly standardized procedure. Despite this, the initial step of recipient hepatectomy has not been the focus of clinical research thus far. Due to advanced coagulopathy in liver transplant recipients, this part of the operation still carries the risk of severe hemorrhage. This trial is designed to compare an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device (LigaSure™) and an ultrasound dissector (HARMONIC ACE®+7) with standard surgical techniques during the recipients' hepatectomy in liver transplantation. METHODS/

designIn a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel, three-armed, confirmatory, open trial, LigaSure™ and HARMONIC ACE®+7 will be compared with standard surgical techniques that use titanium clips and conventional knot-tying ligations during recipient hepatectomy in liver transplantation. Intraoperative total blood loss is the primary endpoint of the trial. Secondary endpoints include blood loss during hepatectomy, the duration of both the hepatectomy and the entire surgical procedure, and blood transfusion requirements of the procedure. To generate reliable data, intraoperative blood loss will be recorded with respect to all rinse fluids during surgery, ascites, and by weighing used swabs. At 80% power and an alpha of 0.025 for both of the experimental groups, 23 subjects will be analyzed per protocol in each study arm in order to detect clinically relevant reduction of intraoperative blood loss. The intention-to-treat analysis will include 69 patients. The follow-up period for each patient will be 90 days for safety reasons, whereas all clinical outcomes will be measured within the first 10 postoperative days. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first prospective, randomized trial comparing two innovative technical methods of vessel sealing and dissection with standard techniques for recipient hepatectomy. This will be done to detect relevant reduction of intraoperative blood loss during liver transplant. The results of the trial are expected to improve patient outcome and safety after liver transplant and to increase the general safety of this procedure.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT 03323242 . Registered on October 26, 2017.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleHepatectomyHumansLiver TransplantationMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareProspective StudiesSample SizeLiver transplantationRecipient hepatectomySurgical technique

Identifiers

PMID30012178
PMCPMC6048720
OpenAlexW2883286727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.