Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30012157›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2018

Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling in Mexico: Results from a focus group study.

Kelsey Holt, Icela Zavala, Ximena Quintero, Doroteo Mendoza, Marie C McCormick, Christine Dehlendorf, Ellice Lieberman, Ana Langer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Attitudes Toward the Copper IUD in Sweden: A Survey Study.Frontiers in global women's health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kelsey HoltDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA. Kelsey.Holt@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9093-4322
Icela ZavalaMexican Family Planning Foundation, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ximena QuinteroMexican Family Planning Foundation, Mexico City, Mexico.
Doroteo MendozaMexican Family Planning Foundation, Mexico City, Mexico.
Marie C McCormickDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
Christine DehlendorfDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Ellice LiebermanDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
Ana LangerWomen and Health Initiative, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA.

Funding

David and Lucile Packard Foundation 2014-40221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClient-centered contraceptive counseling is critical to meeting demand for contraception and protecting human rights. However, despite various efforts to optimize counseling, little is known outside of the United States about what individuals themselves value in counseling. In the present study we investigate women's preferences for contraceptive counseling in Mexico to inform efforts to improve service quality.

methodsWe conducted applied qualitative research, using six focus group discussions with 43 women in two cities in Mexico with distinct sizes and sociocultural contexts (Mexico City and Tepeji del Río, Hidalgo) to assess contraceptive counseling preferences. We used a framework approach to thematically code and analyze the transcriptions from focus groups.

resultsConsistent with quality of care and human rights frameworks for family planning service delivery, participants expressed a desire for privacy, confidentiality, informed choice, and respectful treatment. They expanded on usual concepts of respectful care within family planning to include avoidance of sexual assault or harassment-in line with definitions of respectful care in maternal health. In contrast to counseling approaches with method effectiveness as the organizing principle, participants preferred counseling centered on personalized assessments of needs and preferences. Many, particularly older, less educated women, highly valued hearing provider opinions about what method they should use, based on those personalized assessments. Participants highlighted the necessity of clinical assessments or physical exams to inform provider recommendations for appropriate methods. This desire was largely due to beliefs that more exhaustive medical exams could help prevent negative contraceptive outcomes perceived to be common, in particular expulsion of intra-uterine devices (IUDs), by identifying methods compatible with a woman's body. Trust in provider, built in various ways, was seen as essential to women's contraceptive needs being met.

conclusionsFindings shed light on under-represented perspectives of clients related to counseling preferences. They highlight specific avenues for service delivery improvement in Mexico to ensure clients experience privacy, confidentiality, informed choice, respectful treatment, and personalized counseling-including around reasons for higher IUD expulsion rates postpartum-during contraceptive visits. Findings suggest interventions to improve provider counseling should prioritize a focus on relationship-building to foster trust, and needs assessment skills to facilitate personalization of decision-making support without imposition of a provider's personal opinions. Trust is particularly important to address in family planning given historical abuses against women's autonomy that may still influence perspectives on contraceptive programs. Findings can also be used to improve quantitative client experience measures.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorContraceptionCounselingFamily Planning ServicesQuality of Health CareContraceptive AgentsFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMexicoPregnancyContraceptive AgentsContraceptionCounselingFamily PlanningLatin America and the CaribbeanPatient ExperienceQualitative Research MethodsQuality of Care

Identifiers

PMID30012157
PMCPMC6048723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.