Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30012151›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2018

Client satisfaction with family planning services in the area of high unmet need: evidence from Tanzania Service Provision Assessment Survey, 2014-2015.

Deogratius Bintabara, Julius Ntwenya, Isaac I Maro, Stephen Kibusi, Daniel W Gunda, Bonaventura C T Mpondo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deogratius BintabaraDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, The University of Dodoma, P.O Box 395, Dodoma, Tanzania. bintabaradeo@gmail.com.
Julius NtwenyaDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, The University of Dodoma, P.O Box 395, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Isaac I MaroDepartment of Global Health Entrepreneurship, Division of Public Health, Graduate School of Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Stephen KibusiDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, The University of Dodoma, P.O Box 395, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Daniel W GundaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, P.O. Box 1464, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Bonaventura C T MpondoDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Health Sciences, The University of Dodoma, P.O Box 395, Dodoma, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClient satisfaction has been found to be an important factor for the uptake and continuation of family planning services. This study aimed to examine the current status of and factors associated with client's satisfaction with family planning services in Tanzania, which has a high unmet need for family planning.

methodsThe study used data from the Tanzania Service Provision Assessment survey of 2014-2015. A facility was classified as having high service readiness for FP if it scored at least 67.7% on a composite score based on three domains (staff training and guidelines, basic diagnostic equipment, and basic medicines), following criteria developed by the World Health Organization. The exit interview questionnaire was used to collect information from women about their level of satisfaction, whether "very satisfied," "more or less satisfied," or not satisfied with the services received. The response was dichotomized into "Yes" if the woman reported being very satisfied with services received otherwise coded as "No". Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were used to assess the association between the client satisfaction and covariate variables; service readiness, facility type, managing authority, location, management meetings, supervision, provider's sex, and working experience, clients' age and education. All analyses were weighted to correct for non-response, disproportionate and complex sampling by using the "SVY" command in Stata 14.

resultsOut of the 1188 facilities included in the survey, 427 (35.9%) provided family planning services. A total of 1746 women participated in observations and exit interviews. Few (22%) facilities had a high readiness to provide family planning services. While most facilities had the recommended equipment available, only 42% stocked contraceptives (e.g. oral pills, injectable contraceptives and/or condoms). Further, trained staff and clinical guidelines were present in only 30% of services. Nevertheless, the majority (91%) of clients reported that they were satisfied with services. In the multivariate analysis, a high service readiness score [AOR = 2.5, 95% CI; 1.1-6.0], receiving services from private facilities [AOR = 2.3, 95% CI; 1.1-5.0], and being in the age group 20 to 29 years [AOR = 0.3, 95% CI; 0.1-0.7] were all significantly associated with clients' satisfaction with family planning services.

conclusionThere is a high level of client satisfaction with family planning services in Tanzania. Maintaining and exceeding this level will require improvements in the provision of staff training and the availability of contraceptives in existing services.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CarePersonal SatisfactionQuality of Health CareFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesTanzaniaClient satisfactionFamily planningService readinessTanzania

Identifiers

PMID30012151
PMCPMC6048714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.