Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30012143›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2018

Environmental health risks and benefits of the use of mosquito coils as malaria prevention and control strategy.

Jonathan N Hogarh, Thomas P Agyekum, Crentsil Kofi Bempah, Emmanuel D J Owusu-Ansah, Silas W Avicor, Gordon A Awandare, Julius N Fobil, Kwasi Obiri-Danso

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Parasite epidemiology and control · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan N HogarhDepartment of Environmental Science, College of Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana. jhogarh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4111-1367
Thomas P AgyekumDepartment of Environmental Science, College of Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Crentsil Kofi BempahNuclear Chemistry and Environmental Research Centre, National Nuclear Research Institute, Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, P.O. Box LG 80, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Emmanuel D J Owusu-AnsahDepartment of Mathematics, College of Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Silas W AvicorEntomology Division, Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana, New Tafo-Akim, Ghana.
Gordon A AwandareDepartment of Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.
Julius N FobilDepartment of Biological, Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.
Kwasi Obiri-DansoDepartment of Environmental Science, College of Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology · GHUniversity of Ghana · GHCocoa Research Institute of Ghana · GHGhana Atomic Energy Commission · GH

Funding

WHO/TDR B40106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria is an infectious disease that causes many deaths in sub-Saharan Africa. In resource-poor malaria endemic communities, mosquito coils are commonly applied in households to repel the vector mosquito that transmits malaria parasites. In applying these coils, users have mainly been interested in the environmental health benefits potentially derived from repelling the mosquito, while oblivious of the environmental health risks that may be associated with exposure to emissions from the use of mosquito coil. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the mosquito coil, ascertained and/or estimated the toxic emissions that may emanate from the coil, and determined its overall appropriateness by conducting a risk-benefit analysis of the use of this strategy in malaria prevention at household levels.

methodsThe repellent ability of mosquito coils was tested by conducting a mosquito knockdown/mortality test in experimental chambers synonymous of local room spaces and conditions. The gaseous and particulate emissions from the mosquito coil were also analysed. Additional scenarios were generated with the Monte Carlo technique and a risk-benefit analysis was conducted applying @Risk software.

resultsMosquito mortality arising from the application of various mosquito coils averagely ranged between 24 and 64%, which might not provide adequate repellency effect. Emissions from the mosquito coil were also found to contain CO, VOCs, SO

conclusionAlthough the risk of morbidity from the use of the mosquito coil was low, the coil yielded limited protection as a mosquito avoidance method. It may, therefore, have a reduced benefit in controlling malaria and should be applied sparingly in a highly regulated manner only when traditionally proven effective vector control strategies are not available or too expensive for resource-poor malaria endemic regions.

Indexed as

AnophelesEnvironmental HealthInsecticidesInsect RepellentsMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsAir Pollution, IndoorAnimalsHumansMalariaRisk AssessmentInsecticidesInsect RepellentsIndoor air pollutionMalariaMosquito coilsRisk characterization

Identifiers

PMID30012143
PMCPMC6048806
OpenAlexW2884150212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.