Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30012141›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Increasing influenza and pneumococcal vaccine uptake in the elderly: study protocol for the multi-methods prospective intervention study Vaccination60.

Cornelia Betsch, Constanze Rossmann, Mathias W Pletz, Horst C Vollmar, Antje Freytag, Ole Wichmann, Regina Hanke, Wolfgang Hanke, Dorothee Heinemeier, Philipp Schmid and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The effect of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination in the elderly on health service utilisation and costs: a claims data-based cohort study.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Psychological antecedents of vaccination: definitions, measurement, and interventions].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Cornelia BetschCEREB - Center of Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Nordhäuser Str. 63, 99089, Erfurt, Germany. cornelia.betsch@uni-erfurt.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2856-7303
Constanze RossmannMedia and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Nordhäuser Str. 63, 99089, Erfurt, Germany.
Mathias W PletzCenter for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Horst C VollmarInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Bachstraße 18, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Antje FreytagInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Bachstraße 18, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Ole WichmannRobert Koch Institute, Immunization Unit, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Regina HankeLindgrün GmbH, Strategic Design, Cuxhavener Straße 12, 10555, Berlin, Germany.
Wolfgang HankeLindgrün GmbH, Strategic Design, Cuxhavener Straße 12, 10555, Berlin, Germany.
Dorothee HeinemeierCEREB - Center of Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Nordhäuser Str. 63, 99089, Erfurt, Germany.
Philipp SchmidCEREB - Center of Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Nordhäuser Str. 63, 99089, Erfurt, Germany.
Sarah EitzeCEREB - Center of Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Nordhäuser Str. 63, 99089, Erfurt, Germany.
Winja WeberMedia and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Nordhäuser Str. 63, 99089, Erfurt, Germany.
Anne ReinhardtMedia and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Nordhäuser Str. 63, 99089, Erfurt, Germany.
Nora K KüpkeMedia and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Nordhäuser Str. 63, 99089, Erfurt, Germany.
Christina ForstnerCenter for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Carolin Fleischmann-StruzekCenter for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena, Germany.
Anna MikolajetzDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Josephine RömhildInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Bachstraße 18, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Julia NeufeindRobert Koch Institute, Immunization Unit, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Thorsten RieckRobert Koch Institute, Immunization Unit, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Kasia SucheckaLindgrün GmbH, Strategic Design, Cuxhavener Straße 12, 10555, Berlin, Germany.
Konrad ReinhartCenter for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena, Germany.
University of Erfurt · DEJena University Hospital · DERobert Koch Institute · DELMU Klinikum · DEUniversity Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfluenza and pneumococcal vaccination can prevent disease and potentially life-threatening complications like sepsis. Elderly people have an increased risk of severe disease and therefore constitute a major target group for vaccination. To increase vaccination coverage, targeted interventions are needed that take theory-based specific determinants of vaccination behaviour into account. Moreover, message and campaign design should consider specific age-related characteristics (e.g., information processing, media use). The aim of this study is (i) to identify the specific informational and interventional needs of this risk group, (ii) to design and implement a targeted intervention aiming to decrease vaccine hesitancy, increase vaccine uptake and decrease the health and economic burden due to the respective diseases, and (iii) to measure the effect of this evidence-informed intervention on various levels.

methodsProspective, multi-methods intervention study targeting individuals aged ≥60 years in a model region in Germany (federal state of Thuringia, 500,000 inhabitants ≥60 years old). The development of the intervention follows theory-based and evidence-informed principles: Data from a cross-sectional representative study provide insights into specific determinants of the target group's vaccination behaviour. Additionally, media use is analysed to identify adequate communication channels for specific subgroups. In pilot studies, the intervention materials are adapted to the specific cognitive requirements of the target group. For development and implementation of the intervention, an interdisciplinary and trans-sectoral approach is used, including psychology, communication science, design, medical science, epidemiology and various public health players. The intervention will be implemented in autumn and winter 2017/18 and 2018/19 and adjusted in between. Evaluation of the intervention includes: awareness, use and recall of intervention materials, effects on changes in determinants of vaccination behaviour, self-reported vaccine uptake, and vaccination coverage in the intervention area (primary outcomes), as well as disease incidences (secondary outcomes) and the economic burden of influenza, pneumonia, invasive pneumococcal disease and sepsis for the healthcare system (tertiary outcomes). DISCUSSION: The data will add to the body of evidence on the effectiveness of evidence-informed vaccination campaign development as well as on the clinical and economic effects of pneumococcal and influenza vaccination. The effect of the intervention will teach valuable lessons about the principles of campaign development and evaluation, and can motivate a subsequent nationwide intervention.

trial registrationDRKS00012653 . Registered 24.11.2017. Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Immunization ProgramsPatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccinationVaccinesAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHealth PromotionHealth Services for the AgedHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMaleInfluenza VaccinesPneumococcal VaccinesVaccinesCost analysisElderlyHealthcare designImplementationInfluenzaKnowledgePneumococciPneumoniaPublic healthSepsisTargetingVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID30012141
PMCPMC6048840
OpenAlexW2883743522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.