Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30012130›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Barriers and facilitators for guideline adherence in diagnostic imaging: an explorative study of GPs' and radiologists' perspectives.

Ann Mari Gransjøen, Siri Wiig, Kristin Bakke Lysdahl, Bjørn Morten Hofmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Patients' requests for radiological imaging: A qualitative study on general practitioners' perspectives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. MRI in female pelvis: an ESUR/ESR survey.Insights into imaging · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ann Mari GransjøenDepartment of Health sciences in Gjøvik, Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Gjøvik (NTNU), Teknologiveien 22, 2815, Gjøvik, Norway. ann.gransjoen@ntnu.no.ORCID 0000-0001-7930-1022
Siri WiigFaculty of Health Studies, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholmsgate 41, 4036, Stavanger, Norway.
Kristin Bakke LysdahlFaculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Pilestredet 46, 0167, Oslo, Norway.
Bjørn Morten HofmannDepartment of Health sciences in Gjøvik, Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Gjøvik (NTNU), Teknologiveien 22, 2815, Gjøvik, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnostic imaging has been a part of medicine for the last century. It has been difficult to implement guidelines in this field, and unwarranted imaging has been a frequent problem. Some work has been done to explain these phenomena separately. Identifying the barriers to and facilitators of guideline use has been one strategy. The aim of this study is to offer a more comprehensive explanation of deviations from the guideline by studying the two phenomena together.

methodsEight general practitioners and 10 radiologists from two counties in Norway agreed to semi-structured interviews. Topics covered in the interviews were knowledge of the guideline, barriers to and facilitators of guideline use, implementation of guidelines and factors that influence unwarranted imaging.

resultsSeveral barriers to and facilitators of guideline use were identified. Among these are lack of time, pressure from patients, and guidelines being too long, rigid or unclear. Facilitators of guideline use were easy accessibility and having the guidelines adapted to the target group. Some of the factors that influence unwarranted imaging are lack of time, pressure from patients and availability of imaging services.

conclusionThere are similarities between the perceived barriers for guideline adherence and the perceived factors that influence unwarranted imaging. There may be a few reasons that explains the deviation from guidelines, and the amount of unwarranted imaging.

Indexed as

AdultAttitude of Health PersonnelDiagnostic ImagingFemaleGeneral PractitionersGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPerceptionPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'RadiologistsBarriersDiagnostic imagingFacilitatorsGuideline adherenceUnwarranted imaging

Identifiers

PMID30012130
PMCPMC6048703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.