Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30011873›Full record

ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Review of Short-Form Questions for the Evaluation of a Diet, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Behaviour Intervention in a Community Program Targeting Vulnerable Australian Children.

Janelle A Gifford, Josephine D Gwynn, Louise L Hardy, Nicole Turner, Lily C Henderson, Christine Innes-Hughes, Victoria M Flood

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Janelle A GiffordFaculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East St, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia. janelle.gifford@sydney.edu.au.
Josephine D GwynnFaculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East St, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia. josephine.gwynn@sydney.edu.au.
Louise L HardySydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. louise.hardy@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8656-6758
Nicole TurnerCentre for Rural and Remote Mental Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. nicole.turner@sydney.edu.au.
Lily C HendersonNSW Office of Preventive Health, Liverpool, NSW 1871, Australia. lilyh@heartfoundation.org.nzheartfoundation.org.nz.
Christine Innes-HughesNSW Office of Preventive Health, Liverpool, NSW 1871, Australia. christine.inneshughes@health.nsw.gov.au.
Victoria M FloodFaculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East St, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia. vicki.flood@sydney.edu.au.
The University of Sydney · AUNew South Wales Department of Health · AUCentre for Rural and Remote Mental Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Childhood obesity is associated with low socioeconomic status in developed countries, and community programs can deliver cost-effective obesity interventions to vulnerable children and adolescents at scale. Evaluating these programs in a low-cost, time-efficient, and culturally appropriate way with valid and reliable measures is essential to determining their effectiveness. We aimed to identify existing valid and reliable short-form instruments (≤50 items for diet, ≤15 items for physical activity) suitable for the assessment of change in diet, physical activity, and sedentary behaviour in an Australian obesity intervention program for children and adolescents aged 7⁻13 years from low socioeconomic groups, with a focus on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. Relevant electronic databases were searched, with a focus on Australian literature. Validity and/or reliability studies using diet instruments (5), physical activity/sedentary behaviour instruments (12), and diet and physical activity/sedentary behaviour instruments used with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (3) children were identified. Seven questions on diet, one question on physical activity, and no questions on sedentary behaviour were recommended. These questions can be used for evaluation in community-based obesity programs among Australian children and adolescents, including those from low socioeconomic groups and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children.

Indexed as

adolescentAustralian Aboriginechildcommunity programdietlow-income populationsobesityphysical activityquestionnairessedentary behaviour

Identifiers

PMID30011873
PMCPMC6069381
OpenAlexW2883413620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.