Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30011870›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2018

Clinical Assessment of Dental Implant Stability During Follow-Up: What Is Actually Measured, and Perspectives.

Elisabetta M Zanetti, Giulia Pascoletti, Michele Calì, Cristina Bignardi, Giordano Franceschini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Influencing factors and evaluation methods for early stability of immediate implant.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elisabetta M ZanettiDipartimento di Ingegneria, Università di Perugia, 06125, Italy. elisabetta.zanetti@unipg.it.ORCID 0000-0003-4121-6126
Giulia PascolettiDipartimento di Ingegneria, Università di Perugia, 06125, Italy. giulia.pascoletti@studenti.unipg.it.ORCID 0000-0002-4840-4165
Michele CalìDIEEI, Università di Catania, 95125, Italy. mcali@diim.unict.it.ORCID 0000-0001-8753-8804
Cristina BignardiDIMEAS, Politecnico di Torino, 10129, Italy. cristina-bignardi@polito.it.
Giordano FranceschiniDipartimento di Ingegneria, Università di Perugia, 06125, Italy. giordano.franceschini@unipg.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimization of loading protocols following dental implant insertion requires setting up patient-specific protocols, customized according to the actual implant osseointegration, measured through quantitative, objective methods. Various devices for the assessment of implant stability as an indirect measure of implant osseointegration have been developed. They are analyzed here, introducing the respective physical models, outlining major advantages and critical aspects, and reporting their clinical performance. A careful discussion of underlying hypotheses is finally reported, as is a suggestion for further development of instrumentation and signal analysis.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsAccelerometryHumansOsseointegrationToothTorqueUltrasonographyDental Implantsdampingearly loadingfunctional loadingimplant stabilitymodal analysisosseointegrationresonance frequencyreverse torqueultrasound

Identifiers

PMID30011870
PMCPMC6165397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.