Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30011838›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

Recent Developments in Using

Christine Oriel, Paul Lasko

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Identification ofFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A clinically-relevant residue of POLR1D is required for Drosophila development.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Useful Flies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christine OrielMaternal Infant Child Youth and Research Network, V2-230, 950 West 28th Ave, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada. christine.oriel@cw.bc.ca.
Paul LaskoDepartment of Biology, McGill University, 3649 Promenade Sir-William-Osler, Montreal, QC H3G 0B1, Canada. paul.lasko@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-4037-3501
McGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many insights into human disease have been built on experimental results in

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBiomedical ResearchDrosophilaGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansInternational CooperationRare Diseasesanimal modelsrare Mendelian diseasestargeted funding opportunities

Identifiers

PMID30011838
PMCPMC6073706
OpenAlexW2808410617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.