Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30011793›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2018

Managing Aged Animals in Zoos to Promote Positive Welfare: A Review and Future Directions.

Bethany L Krebs, Debra Marrin, Amy Phelps, Lana Krol, Jason V Watters

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Promoting Good Nonhuman Primate Welfare outside Regular Working Hours.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Management of Dental Disease in Aardvarks (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bethany L KrebsSan Francisco Zoological Society, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA. BethanyK@sfzoo.org.ORCID 0000-0001-8363-7637
Debra MarrinSan Francisco Zoological Society, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA. DebbieM@sfzoo.org.
Amy PhelpsSan Francisco Zoological Society, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA. AmyP@sfzoo.org.
Lana KrolSan Francisco Zoological Society, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA. LanaK@sfzoo.org.
Jason V WattersSan Francisco Zoological Society, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA. JasonW@sfzoo.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improvements in veterinary care, nutrition, and husbandry of animals living in zoos have led to an increase in the longevity of these animals over the past 30 years. In this same time period, the focus of animal welfare science has shifted from concerns over mitigating negative welfare impacts to promoting positive welfare experiences for animals. For instance, providing opportunities for animals to exert agency, solve problems, or acquire rewards are all associated with positive welfare outcomes. Many common age-related changes result in limitations to opportunities for positive welfare experiences, either due to pain or other physical, cognitive, or behavioral limitations. This review aggregates information regarding common age-related physical and behavioral changes across species, discusses how age-related changes may limit positive welfare opportunities of aged animals in human care, and suggests potential management methods to help promote positive welfare for animals at all life stages in zoos and aquariums.

Indexed as

ageingcomparative gerontologygeriatriczoo biology

Identifiers

PMID30011793
PMCPMC6070885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.