Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30011306›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Time course of traumatic neuroma development.

Karla M C Oliveira, Lukas Pindur, Zhihua Han, Mit B Bhavsar, John H Barker, Liudmila Leppik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Neuroma Prevention by Nerve to Artery Coaptation: A Pilot Study.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. High-Resolution Ultrasound of Clinically Relevant Sensory Nerves of the Arm and the Forearm.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Diagnosis and Management of Neuropathic Breast Pain.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karla M C OliveiraFrankfurt Initiative for Regenerative Medicine, JW Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3338-793X
Lukas PindurFrankfurt Initiative for Regenerative Medicine, JW Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Zhihua HanFrankfurt Initiative for Regenerative Medicine, JW Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3128-3077
Mit B BhavsarFrankfurt Initiative for Regenerative Medicine, JW Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
John H BarkerFrankfurt Initiative for Regenerative Medicine, JW Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Liudmila LeppikFrankfurt Initiative for Regenerative Medicine, JW Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was designed to characterize morphologic stages during neuroma development post amputation with an eye toward developing better treatment strategies that intervene before neuromas are fully formed. Right forelimbs of 30 Sprague Dawley rats were amputated and limb stumps were collected at 3, 7, 28, 60 and 90 Days Post Amputation (DPA). Morphology of newly formed nerves and neuromas were assessed via general histology and neurofilament protein antibody staining. Analysis revealed six morphological characteristics during nerve and neuroma development; 1) normal nerve, 2) degenerating axons, 3) axonal sprouts, 4) unorganized bundles of axons, 5) unorganized axon growth into muscles, and 6) unorganized axon growth into fibrotic tissue (neuroma). At early stages (3 & 7 DPA) after amputation, normal nerves could be identified throughout the limb stump and small areas of axonal sprouts were present near the site of injury. Signs of degenerating axons were evident from 7 to 90 DPA. From day 28 on, variability of nerve characteristics with signs of unorganized axon growth into muscle and fibrotic tissue and neuroma formation became visible in multiple areas of stump tissue. These pathological features became more evident on days 60 and 90. At 90 DPA frank neuroma formation was present in all stump tissue. By following nerve regrowth and neuroma formation after amputation we were able to identify 6 separate histological stages of nerve regrowth and neuroma development. Axonal regrowth was observed as early as 3 DPA and signs of unorganized axonal growth and neuroma formation were evident by 28 DPA. Based on these observations we speculate that neuroma treatment and or prevention strategies might be more successful if targeted at the initial stages of development and not after 28 DPA.

Indexed as

Neoplasms, ExperimentalNeuromaWounds and InjuriesAmputation StumpsAnimalsAxonsHindlimbMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID30011306
PMCPMC6047790
OpenAlexW2884217504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.