Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30011303›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

Social determinants affecting the use of complementary and alternative medicine in Japan: An analysis using the conceptual framework of social determinants of health.

Jimpei Misawa, Rie Ichikawa, Akiko Shibuya, Yukihiro Maeda, Teruyoshi Hishiki, Yoshiaki Kondo

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Complementary and Alternative Medicine Attitudes of Gynecologic Patients: Experience in a Tertiary Clinic.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jimpei MisawaDepartment of Health Care Services Management, Nihon University School of Medicine, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3987-8251
Rie IchikawaDepartment of Health Care Services Management, Nihon University School of Medicine, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan.
Akiko ShibuyaDepartment of Health Care Services Management, Nihon University School of Medicine, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukihiro MaedaDepartment of Health Care Services Management, Nihon University School of Medicine, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan.
Teruyoshi HishikiDepartment of Information Science, Faculty of Science, Toho University, Funabashi, Chiba, Japan.
Yoshiaki KondoDepartment of Health Care Services Management, Nihon University School of Medicine, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7106-9388

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to use the conceptual framework of social determinants of health (SDH) to elucidate the social determinants that affect the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) from the perspectives of both intermediary and structural determinants. Data were derived from a survey mailed to 1,500 randomly selected residents (20-69 years old; May-July 2009) of Sendai city in Japan. A generalized linear model was used in the analysis, with CAM use over the past one month as the dependent variable, SDH structural and intermediary determinants as independent variables, and demographic characteristics, indicators of health status, and the evaluation of health or healthcare systems as control variables. The prevalence of CAM usage was 62.1%. The generalized linear model showed that middle subjective social status (OR = 1.47; 95% CI: 1.04-2.07) as structural determinants was significantly associated with CAM usage. Adding the intermediary determinants, the same effect was observed. When demographic characteristics, indicators of health status, and the evaluation of health or healthcare systems were introduced as control variables, the associations of the structural determinants disappeared, revealing that hope (OR = 1.25; 95%CI: 1.04-1.50) as intermediary determinants was associated with the use of CAM. Female sex (OR = 1.47; 95% CI: 1.02-2.12) and health anxiety (OR = 1.68; 95% CI: 1.20-2.34) were associated with CAM usage. We found that intermediary rather than structural determinants were associated with CAM usage. Hope as an intermediary determinant was particularly associated with CAM usage.

Indexed as

Complementary TherapiesDelivery of Health CareHealth Services ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultFemaleHealth StatusHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID30011303
PMCPMC6047791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.