Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30010760›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2018

Training and validation of a novel 4-miRNA ratio model (MiCaP) for prediction of postoperative outcome in prostate cancer patients.

L Schmidt, J Fredsøe, H Kristensen, S H Strand, A Rasmussen, S Høyer, M Borre, P Mouritzen, T Ørntoft, K D Sørensen

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Regulatory role of the miR-142-3p/Translational lung cancer research · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

L SchmidtDepartment of Molecular Medicine (MOMA), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus.
J FredsøeDepartment of Molecular Medicine (MOMA), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus.
H KristensenExiqon A/S, Vedbæk, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
S H StrandDepartment of Molecular Medicine (MOMA), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus.
A RasmussenExiqon A/S, Vedbæk, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
S HøyerDepartments of Histopathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
M BorreDepartments of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
P MouritzenExiqon A/S, Vedbæk, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
T ØrntoftDepartment of Molecular Medicine (MOMA), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus.
K D SørensenDepartment of Molecular Medicine (MOMA), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus. Electronic address: kdso@clin.au.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: New molecular biomarkers for prostate cancer (PC) prognosis are urgently needed. Ratio-based models are attractive, as they require no additional normalization. Here, we train and independently validate a novel 4-miRNA prognostic ratio model for PC. Patients and methods: By genome-wide miRNA expression profiling of PC tissue samples from 123 men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) (PCA123, training cohort), we identified six top candidate prognostic miRNAs and systematically tested their ability to predict postoperative biochemical recurrence (BCR). The best miRNA-based prognostic ratio model (MiCaP) was validated in two independent cohorts (PCA352 and PCA476) including >800 RP patients in total. Clinical end points were BCR and prostate cancer-specific survival (CSS). The prognostic potential of MiCaP was assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox-regression analyses and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results: We identified a 4-miRNA ratio model, MiCaP (miR-23a-3p×miR-10b-5p)/(miR-133a×miR-374b-5p), that predicted time to BCR independently of routine clinicopathologic variables in the training cohort (PCA123) and was successfully validated in two independent RP cohorts. In addition, MiCaP was a significant predictor of CSS in univariate analysis [HR 3.35 (95% CI 1.34 - 8.35), P = 0.0096] and in multivariate analysis [HR 2.43 (95% CI 1.45-4.07), P = 0.0210]. As proof-of-principle, we also analyzed MiCaP in plasma samples from 111 RP patients. A high MiCaP score in plasma was significantly associated with BCR (P = 0.0036, Kaplan-Meier analysis). Limitations include low mortality rates (CSS: 5.4%). Conclusions: We identified a novel 4-miRNA ratio model (MiCaP) with significant independent prognostic value in three RP cohorts, indicating promising potential to improve PC risk stratification.

Indexed as

ProstatectomyAgedBiomarkers, TumorDisease-Free SurvivalFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression ProfilingHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostoperative PeriodPredictive Value of TestsPreoperative PeriodPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID30010760
PMCPMC6158759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.