Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30010752›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2018

Inter and Intraspecific Genomic Divergence in Drosophila montana Shows Evidence for Cold Adaptation.

Darren J Parker, R Axel W Wiberg, Urmi Trivedi, Venera I Tyukmaeva, Karim Gharbi, Roger K Butlin, Anneli Hoikkala, Maaria Kankare, Michael G Ritchie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparative Metabolomic Study ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Within-population sperm competition intensity does not predict asymmetry in conpopulation sperm precedence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Darren J ParkerDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
R Axel W WibergCenter for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom.
Urmi TrivediEdinburgh Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Venera I TyukmaevaDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Karim GharbiEdinburgh Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Roger K ButlinDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, The University of Sheffield, UK.
Anneli HoikkalaDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Maaria KankareDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Michael G RitchieCenter for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom.
University of Jyväskylä · FIUniversity of St Andrews · GBEdinburgh Genomics · GBNorwich Research Park · GBUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genomes of species that are ecological specialists will likely contain signatures of genomic adaptation to their niche. However, distinguishing genes related to ecological specialism from other sources of selection and more random changes is a challenge. Here, we describe the genome of Drosophila montana, which is the most extremely cold-adapted Drosophila species known. We use branch tests to identify genes showing accelerated divergence in contrasts between cold- and warm-adapted species and identify about 250 genes that show differences, possibly driven by a lower synonymous substitution rate in cold-adapted species. We also look for evidence of accelerated divergence between D. montana and D. virilis, a previously sequenced relative, but do not find strong evidence for divergent selection on coding sequence variation. Divergent genes are involved in a variety of functions, including cuticular and olfactory processes. Finally, we also resequenced three populations of D. montana from across its ecological and geographic range. Outlier loci were more likely to be found on the X chromosome and there was a greater than expected overlap between population outliers and those genes implicated in cold adaptation between Drosophila species, implying some continuity of selective process at these different evolutionary scales.

Indexed as

AcclimatizationAnimalsCold TemperatureDiapauseDrosophilaGenome, InsectMolecular Sequence AnnotationPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID30010752
PMCPMC6107330
OpenAlexW2952779014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.