ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
BrainImageR: spatiotemporal gene set analysis referencing the human brain.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic and epigenomic dynamics associated with development of human iPSC-derived GABAergic interneurons.Human molecular genetics · 2020Article
- Modeling Brain Disorders Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2020Review
- Article
- The Transcriptional Landscape of Microglial Genes in Aging and Neurodegenerative Disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Neuronal analyses such as transcriptomics, epigenetics and genome-wide association studies must be assessed in the context of the human brain to generate biologically meaningful inferences. It is often difficult to access primary human brain tissue; therefore, approximations are made using alternative sources such as peripheral tissues or in vitro-derived neurons. Gene sets from these studies are then assessed for their association with the post-mortem human brain. However, most analyses of post-mortem datasets are achieved by building new computational tools each time in-house, which can cause discrepancies from study to study. The field is in need of a user-friendly tool to examine spatiotemporal expression with respect to the postmortem brain. Such a tool will be of use in the molecular interrogation of neurological and psychiatric disorders, with direct advantages for the disease-modeling and human genetics communities. Results: We have developed brainImageR, an R package that calculates both the spatial and temporal association of a dataset with post-mortem human brain. BrainImageR identifies anatomical regions enriched for candidate gene set expression. It further predicts the developmental time point of the sample, a task that has become increasingly important in the field of in vitro neuronal modeling. These functionalities of brainImageR enable a quick and efficient characterization of a given dataset across normal human brain development. Availability and implementation: BrainImageR is released under the Creative Commons CC BY-SA 4.0 license and can be accessed directly at brainimager.salk.edu or the R code can be downloaded through github at https://github.com/saralinker/brainImageR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.