ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
Uncertainty quantification, propagation and characterization by Bayesian analysis combined with global sensitivity analysis applied to dynamical intracellular pathway models.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-driven multiscale virtual plant cell modeling: from molecular mechanisms to tissue functions.Planta · 2026Review
- Uncertainty undermines the validity of antimicrobial pharmacodynamics.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2026Article
- Long-term effects of multicomponent training on body composition and physical fitness in breast cancer survivors: a controlled study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Conformal prediction for uncertainty quantification in dynamic biological systems.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Fitting and comparison of calcium-calmodulin kinetic schemes to a common data set using non-linear mixed effects modelling.PloS one · 2025Article
- Identifying Bayesian optimal experiments for uncertain biochemical pathway models.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- A Modular Workflow for Model Building, Analysis, and Parameter Estimation in Systems Biology and Neuroscience.Neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- Neuronal population models reveal specific linear conductance controllers sufficient to rescue preclinical disease phenotypes.iScience · 2021Article
- Article
- Bayesian uncertainty quantification for data-driven equation learning.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2021Article
- Efficient exact inference for dynamical systems with noisy measurements using sequential approximate Bayesian computation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Dynamical models describing intracellular phenomena are increasing in size and complexity as more information is obtained from experiments. These models are often over-parameterized with respect to the quantitative data used for parameter estimation, resulting in uncertainty in the individual parameter estimates as well as in the predictions made from the model. Here we combine Bayesian analysis with global sensitivity analysis (GSA) in order to give better informed predictions; to point out weaker parts of the model that are important targets for further experiments, as well as to give guidance on parameters that are essential in distinguishing different qualitative output behaviours. Results: We used approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) to estimate the model parameters from experimental data, as well as to quantify the uncertainty in this estimation (inverse uncertainty quantification), resulting in a posterior distribution for the parameters. This parameter uncertainty was next propagated to a corresponding uncertainty in the predictions (forward uncertainty propagation), and a GSA was performed on the predictions using the posterior distribution as the possible values for the parameters. This methodology was applied on a relatively large model relevant for synaptic plasticity, using experimental data from several sources. We could hereby point out those parameters that by themselves have the largest contribution to the uncertainty of the prediction as well as identify parameters important to separate between qualitatively different predictions. This approach is useful both for experimental design as well as model building. Availability and implementation: Source code is freely available at https://github.com/alexjau/uqsa. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.