Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30010712›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019

Uncertainty quantification, propagation and characterization by Bayesian analysis combined with global sensitivity analysis applied to dynamical intracellular pathway models.

Olivia Eriksson, Alexandra Jauhiainen, Sara Maad Sasane, Andrei Kramer, Anu G Nair, Carolina Sartorius, Jeanette Hellgren Kotaleski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Uncertainty undermines the validity of antimicrobial pharmacodynamics.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bayesian uncertainty quantification for data-driven equation learning.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Olivia ErikssonScience for Life Laboratory, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Alexandra JauhiainenBiometrics, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sara Maad SasaneCentre for Mathematical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Andrei KramerScience for Life Laboratory, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anu G NairScience for Life Laboratory, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Carolina SartoriusCentre for Mathematical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jeanette Hellgren KotaleskiScience for Life Laboratory, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

CRCNS: Spatio-temporal Dynamics of Dopamine Activated 2nd Messenger PathwaysR01AA016022 · NIAAA · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI BLACKWELL, KIM L, LOVINGER, DAVID · 2005 to 2017
$2.6M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA016022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Dynamical models describing intracellular phenomena are increasing in size and complexity as more information is obtained from experiments. These models are often over-parameterized with respect to the quantitative data used for parameter estimation, resulting in uncertainty in the individual parameter estimates as well as in the predictions made from the model. Here we combine Bayesian analysis with global sensitivity analysis (GSA) in order to give better informed predictions; to point out weaker parts of the model that are important targets for further experiments, as well as to give guidance on parameters that are essential in distinguishing different qualitative output behaviours. Results: We used approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) to estimate the model parameters from experimental data, as well as to quantify the uncertainty in this estimation (inverse uncertainty quantification), resulting in a posterior distribution for the parameters. This parameter uncertainty was next propagated to a corresponding uncertainty in the predictions (forward uncertainty propagation), and a GSA was performed on the predictions using the posterior distribution as the possible values for the parameters. This methodology was applied on a relatively large model relevant for synaptic plasticity, using experimental data from several sources. We could hereby point out those parameters that by themselves have the largest contribution to the uncertainty of the prediction as well as identify parameters important to separate between qualitatively different predictions. This approach is useful both for experimental design as well as model building. Availability and implementation: Source code is freely available at https://github.com/alexjau/uqsa. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremModels, BiologicalModels, NeurologicalSoftwareComputational BiologyHumansNeuronal PlasticityUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID30010712
PMCPMC6330009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.