ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2018
Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of Needle Hydrophones: Predictions From Four Theoretical Forms Compared With Measurements.
Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative photoacoustic tomography: modeling and inverse problems.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Review
- The characteristic analysis of phase-controlled array thermo-acoustic emission with multiple emitting surfaces.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Hydrophone Measurements for Biomedical Ultrasound Applications: A Review.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2023Review
- A PVDF Receiver for Acoustic Monitoring of Microbubble-Mediated Ultrasound Brain Therapy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Spatiotemporal Deconvolution of Hydrophone Response for Linear and Nonlinear Beams-Part I: Theory, Spatial-Averaging Correction Formulas, and Criteria for Sensitive Element Size.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2022Article
- Optical phase contrast imaging for absolute, quantitative measurements of ultrasonic fields with frequencies up to 20 MHz.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021Article
- Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part I: Theory and Impact on Diagnostic Safety Indexes.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021Article
- Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part II: Validation for ARFI and Pulsed Doppler Waveforms.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021Article
- Correction for Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circular Sources.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2020Article
- Correction for Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circularly-Symmetric Pressure Beams Measured with Membrane Hydrophones.IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium : [proceedings]. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium · 2020Article
- Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for ARFI Beams from Array Transducers.IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium : [proceedings]. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium · 2020Article
- Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of Membrane Hydrophones: Theory Versus Experiment.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2019Article
- Correction for Spatial Averaging Artifacts in Hydrophone Measurements of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound: An Inverse Filter Approach.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2019Article
- Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part I: Spatiotemporal Transfer Function and Graphical Guide.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2019Article
- Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part II: Experimental Validation of Spatial Averaging Model.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2019Article
- Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of a Reflectance-Based Fiber-Optic Hydrophone: Predictions From Theoretical Models Compared With Measurements.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Directivity is a hydrophone specification that describes response as a function of angle of incidence. The goal of this study was to compare, in the context of needle hydrophones, the commonly used rigid baffle model for hydrophone directivity to three alternative models: soft baffle, unbaffled (UB), and rigid piston (RP). Directivity measurements were performed at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 10 MHz from ±7° in two orthogonal planes for two ceramic and two polymer needle hydrophones with nominal geometrical sensitive element diameters of 200, 400, 600, and 1000 . Effective hydrophone sensitive element radius was estimated by least-squares fitting the four models to directivity measurement data using the sensitive element radius (a) as an adjustable parameter. For > 4 (where and = wavelength), the RP model outperformed the other three models. For , the average error in estimated sensitive element radius was 7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 3%-12%] for the RP model while the lowest average error by the other three models was 46% (95% CI: 38%-54%) for the UB model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.