Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30010549›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2019

Generalized Mean Apparent Propagator MRI to Measure and Image Advective and Dispersive Flows in Medicine and Biology.

Dan Benjamini, Michal E Komlosh, Nathan H Williamson, Peter J Basser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Limits to flow detection in phase contrast MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance open · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Phase contrast MRI of creeping flows using stimulated echo.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dan Benjamini
Michal E Komlosh
Nathan H Williamson
Peter J Basser
National Institutes of Health · USHenry M. Jackson Foundation · US

Funding

Imaging Water Diffusion in the Brain and in Other Soft TissuesZIAHD000266 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI BASSER, PETER J. · 2009 to 2017
$3.3M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HD000266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water transport in biological systems spans different regimes with distinct physical behaviors: diffusion, advection, and dispersion. Identifying these regimes is of paramount importance in many in vivo applications, among them, measuring microcirculation of blood in capillary networks and cerebrospinal fluid transport in the glymphatic system. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) can be used to encode water displacements, and a Fourier transform of the acquired signal furnishes a displacement probability density function known as the propagator. This transformation normally requires the use of a fast Fourier transform (FFT), which presents major feasibility challenges when scanning in vivo, mainly because of dense signal sampling, resulting in long acquisition times. A second approach to reconstruct the propagator is by using analytical representation of the signal, overcoming many of the FFT's limitations. In all analytical implementations of dMRI to date, the translational motion of water has been assumed to be exclusively diffusive, which is the case only in the absence of flow. However, retaining the phase information from the diffusion signal provides the ability to measure both mean coherent velocity and random diffusion from a single experiment. We implement and extend an analytical framework, mean apparent propagator (MAP), which can account for non-zero flow conditions. We call this method generalized MAP or GMAP. We describe a numerical optimization scheme and implement it on data from an MRI flow phantom constructed from a pack of 10- [Formula: see text] beads. The advantages of GMAP over the FFT-based method in the context of sampling density and low-flow detection were demonstrated, and analytically derived propagator moments were shown to agree with theoretical values even after data subsampling. GMAP would enable the detection of microflow in vivo that could help elucidate many important biological processes.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFourier AnalysisGlymphatic SystemImage Processing, Computer-AssistedModels, BiologicalPhantoms, Imaging

Identifiers

PMID30010549
PMCPMC6345276
OpenAlexW2883875058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.