Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30010547›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2019

Ionic Direct Current Modulation for Combined Inhibition/Excitation of the Vestibular System.

Felix P Aplin, Dilawer Singh, Charles C Della Santina, Gene Y Fridman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Vestibular prosthesis: from basic research to clinics.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Difference in Network Effects of Pulsatile and Galvanic Stimulation.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. On-chip ionic current sensor.Applied physics. A, Materials science & processing · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A microfluidic system integrated with shape memory alloy valves for a safe direct current delivery system.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felix P Aplin
Dilawer Singh
Charles C Della Santina
Gene Y Fridman
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Electrical Stimulation to Restore Three Dimensional Vestibular SensationR01DC009255 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DELLA SANTINA, CHARLES C · 2008 to 2018
$5.7M
Safe Direct Current for Neuroprosthetic ApplicationsR01NS092726 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FRIDMAN, GENE YEVGENY · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009255NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS092726
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveProsthetic electrical stimulation delivered to the vestibular nerve could provide therapy for people suffering from bilateral vestibular dysfunction. Common encoding methods use pulse-frequency modulation (PFM) to stimulate the semicircular canals of the vestibular system. We previously showed that delivery of ionic direct current (iDC) can also modulate the vestibular system. In this study, we compare the dynamic range of head velocity encoding from iDC modulation to that of PFM controls.

methodsGentamicin-treated wild-type chinchillas were implanted with microcatheter tubes that delivered ionic current to the left ear vestibular canals and stimulated with steps of anodic/cathodic iDC or PFM. Evoked vestibulo-ocular reflex eye velocity was used to compare PFM and iDC vestibular modulation.

resultsCathodic iDC steps effectively elicited eye rotations consistent with an increased firing rate of the implanted semicircular canal afferents. Anodic iDC current steps elicited eye rotations in the opposite direction that, when paired with an adapted cathodic offset, increased the dynamic range of eye rotation velocities in comparison to PFM controls.

conclusionOur results suggest that iDC modulation can effectively modulate the vestibular system across a functional range of rotation vectors and velocities, with a potential benefit over a PFM stimulation paradigm. SIGNIFICANCE: In conjunction with a safe dc delivery system, iDC modulation could potentially increase the range of simulated head rotation velocities available to neuroelectric vestibular prostheses.

Indexed as

Neural ProsthesesAnimalsBiomedical EngineeringChinchillaElectric StimulationEye MovementsGentamicinsNeurosciencesVestibule, LabyrinthGentamicins

Identifiers

PMID30010547
PMCPMC6626664
OpenAlexW2884709478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.