Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30009836›Full record

ArticleNeuropharmacology2018

Contributions of medial prefrontal cortex to decision making involving risk of punishment.

Caitlin A Orsini, Sara C Heshmati, Tyler S Garman, Shannon C Wall, Jennifer L Bizon, Barry Setlow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Circuit and Cell-Specific Contributions to Decision Making Involving Risk of Explicit Punishment in Male and Female Rats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Caitlin A OrsiniDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Sara C HeshmatiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Tyler S GarmanDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Shannon C WallDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Jennifer L BizonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA; Center for Addiction Research and Education, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Barry SetlowDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA; Center for Addiction Research and Education, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA. Electronic address: setlow@ufl.edu.

Funding

Risk taking and cocaine use: interactions, mechanisms, and therapeutic targetsR01DA036534 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SETLOW, BARRY · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
Neural mechanism of enduring cocaine effects on impulsive choiceR01DA024671 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SETLOW, BARRY · 2009 to 2013
$1.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024671NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) plays an important role in several forms of cost-benefit decision making. Its contributions to decision making under risk of explicit punishment, however, are not well understood. A rat model was used to investigate the role of the medial PFC (mPFC) and its monoaminergic innervation in a Risky Decision-making Task (RDT), in which rats chose between a small, "safe" food reward and a large, "risky" food reward accompanied by varying probabilities of mild footshock punishment. Inactivation of mPFC increased choice of the large, risky reward when the punishment probability increased across the session ("ascending RDT"), but decreased choice of the large, risky reward when the punishment probability decreased across the session ("descending RDT"). In contrast, enhancement of monoamine availability via intra-mPFC amphetamine reduced choice of the large, risky reward only in the descending RDT. Systemic administration of amphetamine reduced choice of the large, risky reward in both the ascending and descending RDT; however, this reduction was not attenuated by concurrent mPFC inactivation, indicating that mPFC is not a critical locus of amphetamine's effects on risk taking. These findings suggest that mPFC plays an important role in adapting choice behavior in response to shifting risk contingencies, but not necessarily in risk-taking behavior per se.

Indexed as

PunishmentRisk-TakingAmphetamineAnimalsBiogenic MonoaminesDecision MakingFeeding BehaviorMaleNeurotransmitter Uptake InhibitorsPrefrontal CortexPsychotropic DrugsRats, Long-EvansAmphetamineBiogenic MonoaminesNeurotransmitter Uptake InhibitorsPsychotropic DrugsDecision makingMedial prefrontal cortexMonoaminePunishmentRisk

Identifiers

PMID30009836
PMCPMC6108435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.