Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30009817›Full record

GuidelineGastroenterology2019

Rome Foundation Working Team Report on Post-Infection Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Giovanni Barbara, Madhusudan Grover, Premysl Bercik, Maura Corsetti, Uday C Ghoshal, Lena Ohman, Mirjana Rajilić-Stojanović

Open access · bronzeAbstract readPractice GuidelineSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Guideline in Gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
18.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 265 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Efficacy and dose response ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Irritable bowel syndrome.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Diagnosis and treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea: Key clinical considerations.Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Diarrhea management: from pathophysiology to microbiota modulation.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A review of chronic enterocolitis of rhesus macaques (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Review
  19. The road to Rome IV and beyond: Evolution, refinements and future considerations for the Rome criteria for functional gastrointestinal disorders.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Giovanni BarbaraDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. Electronic address: giovanni.barbara@unibo.it.
Madhusudan GroverEnteric NeuroScience Program, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Premysl BercikDepartment of Medicine, Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Maura CorsettiNottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Nottingham, UK.
Uday C GhoshalDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
Lena OhmanDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mirjana Rajilić-StojanovićDepartment of Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Mayo Clinic · USNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBPopulation Health Research Institute · CASanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · INUniversity of Belgrade · RSUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

"Barrier function alterations in post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome"K23DK103911 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GROVER, MADHUSUDAN · 2015 to 2019
$804k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK103911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsThe existence of postinfection irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS) has been substantiated by epidemiology studies conducted in diverse geographic and clinical settings. However, the available evidence has not been well summarized, and there is little guidance for diagnosis and treatment of PI-IBS. The ROME Foundation has produced a working team report to summarize the available evidence on the pathophysiology of PI-IBS and provide guidance for diagnosis and treatment, based on findings reported in the literature and clinical experience.

methodsThe working team conducted an evidence-based review of publication databases for articles describing the clinical features (diagnosis), pathophysiology (intestinal sensorimotor function, microbiota, immune dysregulation, barrier dysfunction, enteroendocrine pathways, and genetics), and animal models of PI-IBS. We used a Delphi-based consensus system to create guidelines for management of PI-IBS and a developed treatment algorithm based on published findings and experiences of team members.

resultsPI-IBS develops in about 10% of patients with infectious enteritis. Risk factors include female sex, younger age, psychological distress during or before acute gastroenteritis, and severity of the acute episode. The pathogenesis of PI-PBS appears to involve changes in the intestinal microbiome as well as epithelial, serotonergic, and immune system factors. However, these mechanisms are incompletely understood. There are no evidence-based, effective pharmacologic strategies for treatment of PI-IBS. We provide a consensus-based treatment algorithm, based on clinical presentation and potential disease mechanisms.

conclusionsBased on a systematic review of the literature and team experience, we summarize the clinical features, pathophysiology (from animal models and human studies), and progression of PI-IBS. Based on these findings, we present an algorithm for diagnosis and treatment of PI-IBS based on team consensus. We also propose areas for future investigation.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsClinical Decision-MakingCommunicable DiseasesConsensusDelphi TechniqueGastroenteritisHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromePredictive Value of TestsPrevalencePrognosisRisk FactorsBarrier FunctionCampylobacterGastrointestinal InfectionMicrobiomeSerotonin

Identifiers

PMID30009817
PMCPMC6309514
OpenAlexW2884101926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.