ReviewJournal of molecular biology2018
Perspectives on Structural Molecular Biology Visualization: From Past to Present.
Review in Journal of molecular biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dissecting the function of the DNMT2-homolog (DNMA) in Dictyostelium discoideum.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- VTX: real-time high-performance molecular structure and dynamics visualization software.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- A comprehensive review on structural insights through molecular visualization: tools, applications, and limitations.Journal of molecular modeling · 2025Review
- 3D-Printed Self-Assembling Helical Models for Exploring Viral Capsid Structures.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Concise Review of Biomolecule Visualization.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
- From complex data to clear insights: visualizing molecular dynamics trajectories.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- PDBImages: a command-line tool for automated macromolecular structure visualization.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Multiplayer virtual reality for understanding biomolecular structures.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2023Article
- A brief history of visualizing membrane systems in molecular dynamics simulations.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Self-Assembly, Self-Folding, and Origami: Comparative Design Principles.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Modeling Polyzwitterion-Based Drug Delivery Platforms: A Perspective of the Current State-of-the-Art and Beyond.ACS engineering Au · 2022Review
- Strategies for the Production of Molecular Animations.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2022Review
- Grand Challenges in Bioinformatics Data Visualization.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Art and Science of the Cellular Mesoscale.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2020Review
- iCn3D, a web-based 3D viewer for sharing 1D/2D/3D representations of biomolecular structures.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Illustrate: Software for Biomolecular Illustration.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2019Article
- Changing Aesthetics in Biomolecular Graphics.IEEE computer graphics and applicationsArticle
- Seeing the PDB.The Journal of biological chemistryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Visualization has been a key technology in the progress of structural molecular biology for as long as the field has existed. This perspective describes the nature of the visualization process in structural studies, how it has evolved over the years, and its relationship to the changes in technology that have supported and driven it. It focuses on how technical advances have changed the way we look at and interact with molecular structure, and how structural biology has fostered and challenged that technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.