ArticleSICOT-J2018
Accuracy of bone resection in total knee arthroplasty using CT assisted-3D printed patient specific cutting guides.
Article in SICOT-J, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Bony Resection Accuracy with Patient-Specific Instruments during Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case Series Study.BioMed research international · 2021Trial
- Single-use, patient-specific instrumentation technology in knee arthroplasty: a comparative study between standard instrumentation and PSI efficiency system.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2020Trial
- Article
- Femoral resection accuracy and precision in manual caliper-verified kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- The feasibility of a novel 3D-Printed patient specific cutting guide for extended trochanteric osteotomies.3D printing in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Use of a preoperative 3D templating and proximal lateral tibial fitting patient-specific instrumentation in fixed valgus complex primary total knee arthroplasty for a patient with retaining hardware for internal fixation to treat Schatzker type V tibial plateau fracture: A case report.SAGE open medical case reports · 2023Article
- 3D templating and patient-specific instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty with retained internal fixation hardware: Two case reports.Trauma case reports · 2022Article
- Total knee arthroplasty, following application of Taylor Spatial Frames to treat knee osteoarthritis with severe tibia extraarticular deformity due to fracture malunion: A case report.Trauma case reports · 2022Article
- In-hospital production of 3D-printed casts for non-displaced wrist and hand fractures.SICOT-J · 2022Article
- A Coronal Landmark for Tibial Component Positioning With Anatomical Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Radiological and Clinical Study.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing of Medical Devices Used Directly to Treat Patients: A Systematic Review.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2021Review
- Evaluation of the accuracy of resected bone thickness based on patient-specific instrumentation during total knee arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2021Article
- In-House, Fast FDM Prototyping of a Custom Cutting Guide for a Lower-Risk Pediatric Femoral Osteotomy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Angular limit for coronal joint deformity correction using intramedullary guidance in total knee arthroplasty. A pilot study.SICOT-J · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe conducted this study to determine if the pre-surgical patient specific instrumented planning based on Computed Tomography (CT) scans can accurately predict each of the femoral and tibial resections performed through 3D printed cutting guides. The technique helps in optimization of component positioning determined by accurate bone resection and hence overall alignment thereby reducing errors.
methodsProphecy evolution medial pivot patient specific instrumented knee replacement systems were used for end stage arthrosis in all consecutive cases over a period of 20 months by a single surgeon. All resections (4 femoral and 2 tibial) were measured using a vernier callipers intraoperatively. These respective measurements were then compared with the preoperative CT predicted bone resection surgical plan to determine margins of errors that were categorized into 7 groups (0 mm to ≥2.6 mm).
resultsA total of 3618 measurements (averaged to 1206) were performed in 201 knees (105 right and 96 left) in 188 patients (112 females and 76 males) with an average age of 67.72 years (44 to 90 years) and average BMI of 32.3 (25.1 to 42.3). 94% of all collected resection readings were below the error margin of ≤1.5 mm of which 90% showed resection error of ≤1 mm. Mean error of different resections were ≤0.60 mm (P ≤ 0.0001). In 24% of measurements there were no errors or deviations from the templated resection (0.0 mm).
conclusionThe 3D printed cutting blocks with slots for jigs accurately predict bone resections in patient specific instrumentation total knee arthroplasty which would directly affect component positioning.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.